This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User
Well, you seem to have missed the slight but significant point that
Of those various applications, only US-2020279585-A1 mentions COVID-19, and it was filed on May 17, 2020.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User Oh well that's ok then. Covid was, I mean IS, a wordwide disaster, which has killed 0.03% of humanity. And nobody made a penny from it. All good people, serving us with all their might. That's a relief! Thanks for that

SW-User
@WalterF You're welcome. But you know as well as I do that the original patent describes a method
The most recent patent, filed in May 2020, is the only one that adds the words "such as COVID-19." It even says as much on the screenshot you provided as "evidence".
I know you desperately want to believe it ain't so, and that COVID-19 was known about years in advance, but you know the truth as well as I do. Nice try 🤭
"for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection."
The most recent patent, filed in May 2020, is the only one that adds the words "such as COVID-19." It even says as much on the screenshot you provided as "evidence".
I know you desperately want to believe it ain't so, and that COVID-19 was known about years in advance, but you know the truth as well as I do. Nice try 🤭
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User There is so much more you don't know because you are a BELIEVER. You follow the religion preached to you 24/7 by the media, which you trust with your life. You are afraid to think outside the kill box. For three years now, tens of thousands of researchers worldwide have been uncovering the scam. Their work, despite the desperate efforts of the "fact-checkers", is available to all who look for it.
But you will never change. Nor will I. So I wish you well.
But you will never change. Nor will I. So I wish you well.

SW-User
@WalterF But as usual, you have provided no evidence of this, or any other "scam". Your misleading post here smacks of utter desperation because you are a BELIEVER yourself. You desperately want to believe that COVID was artificially created as the first step to ushering in a New World Order, and that's fine. You can keep the "faith", if you want to look at it like that.
The rest of us will continue to live our lives and sleep easy in our beds :) Have a good weekend.
The rest of us will continue to live our lives and sleep easy in our beds :) Have a good weekend.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User No, I will provide you with nothing, for the two valid reasons which your "fact-checker" crutches dismiss with great glee (being themselves blinded individuals who care more for their own bank balance than for truthful analysis).
The two reasons are:
1. Do your own research - you don't need spoonfeeding, do you? Use your brain, your independence of thought (unless it's already been totally sacrificed on the altar of compliance)
2. Any sources I would give - and there are so many valid ones - you will simply pass through the lenses of said "fat-chequers" and use their scathing take-downs to undermine valid research. (Example of f-c strategy: this man "peddles" "natural" products (how dare he?) AND we have learnt that in elementary school he was once caught smoking in the toilets - how could you ever believe a man like that, even though he has degrees in immunology and a PhD and 3 decades experience?)
So laughable, and so predictable.
Oh by the way, I see you were unable to replicate my goodwill gesture (wishing you well). Why was that? because of your hatred for independent thinkers?
I repeat - I sincerely wish you all the best.
The two reasons are:
1. Do your own research - you don't need spoonfeeding, do you? Use your brain, your independence of thought (unless it's already been totally sacrificed on the altar of compliance)
2. Any sources I would give - and there are so many valid ones - you will simply pass through the lenses of said "fat-chequers" and use their scathing take-downs to undermine valid research. (Example of f-c strategy: this man "peddles" "natural" products (how dare he?) AND we have learnt that in elementary school he was once caught smoking in the toilets - how could you ever believe a man like that, even though he has degrees in immunology and a PhD and 3 decades experience?)
So laughable, and so predictable.
Oh by the way, I see you were unable to replicate my goodwill gesture (wishing you well). Why was that? because of your hatred for independent thinkers?
I repeat - I sincerely wish you all the best.

SW-User
@WalterF Does this sound familiar?
That's you, I'm afraid. I wish you well, but you're dismissed.
“I’m going to connect some dots and I’m going to present you with some information,” begins one video from a TikTok psychic and podcaster. “What you do with this information is up to you.” This pretty much sums up the approach of all online conspiracy theorists: presenting loaded facts and information, and encouraging you, the viewer, to piece them together in your mind. It makes the viewer feel smart, and the creator gets to avoid any explicit claims that might get them in trouble.
That's you, I'm afraid. I wish you well, but you're dismissed.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User Yes, I recognise it. Typical f-c drivel. Sad.
Tell you what, rendezvous on here in, say, one year? I was going to say five years, but one should be enough. Longer, and you might be taken away by one of those extra-terrestrials you and your like believe in.
Tell you what, rendezvous on here in, say, one year? I was going to say five years, but one should be enough. Longer, and you might be taken away by one of those extra-terrestrials you and your like believe in.

SW-User
@WalterF OK, the fact remains, there is no global conspiracy surrounding covid. Sorry, but that's just the way it is. Learn to relax and enjoy life :)
WalterF · 70-79, M
@SW-User Ah, you're starting to talk like a reasonable person. That's encouraging.
All the best to you. (Until we cross swords again)
All the best to you. (Until we cross swords again)

SW-User
@WalterF To you too, sir