This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Have you ever questioned Germ Theory? Our whole society is based on it. The whole medical profession is based on it. It is why they give us vaccines.

Did you know Louis Pasteur, the man who came up with Germ Theory, said that he was wrong at the end of his life?

Did you know that there have been studies / experiments carried out that showed you cannot catch influenza, and various other viruses, from someone else?

Did you know that there are many Doctors, scientists, researchers and nutritionists that do not agree with Germ Theory?

Doctors, scientists, researchers and nutritionists that say you cannot catch a virus and that a virus is made by your own body to cleanse you of toxicity.

Does all the toxicity and chemicals that we are in contact with on this planet have an effect on us? (e.g chemtrails, chemicals in tap water, ‘health’ products, cleaning products, industrial pollution, processed food, hygiene products, weed killers, insecticides, vaccines etc etc)

If Germ theory collapsed, the massive Pharmaceuticals would lose many Billions or Trillions of pounds, even perhaps go out of business, and nobody would consent to the poisonous vaccines that our governments are always trying to give us.

Germ Theory has been one of the biggest ever deceptions.

Some quotes to begin with – from some Doctors and a Nutritionist:

“In all that I have witnessed inside and outside of laboratories, there is only one cause of disease: Industrial pollution in medication, food, air, soil and water. Strengthening a body’s constitution and lymphatic system is the first step to reversing/curing disease” – Aajonus Vonderplantiz

“…Viruses are simply the excretions of a toxic cell. Viruses are pieces of DNA or RNA, with a few other proteins. They butt out from the cell. They happen when the cell is poisoned. They are not the cause of anything.” – Thomas Cowan MD on Rudolf Steiner’s insights (I do not necessarily endorse what Steiner says about other topics, but this quote is a good summation of viruses)


Thomas Cowan M.D and Rudolf Steiner
“You’re working under a wrong premise to begin with and you’re never going to find the answer if you do that. Viruses have no nucleus. There’s no respiratory system. There’s no circulatory system. There’s no digestive system. Viruses are not alive. That’s like saying soap is alive. They’re not alive. They are solvents. They are soaps. However, more accurately, they are enzymes to fractionate tissue for waste elimination.” – Aajonus Vonderplanitz


Aajonus Vonderplanitz
“We agree with those members of the profession who hold that no germ causes tuberculosis. Germs do not cause any disease. Further, we agree that there is more harm in the fear of germs than there is in the germs themselves.” — Timely Truths on Human Health – Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D. 1921

“The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of the unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infections and contagious disorders are caused by germs.” – M.L. Leverson, M.D

“We said before that so-called “germs” are ubiquitous. They are ever present, in many varying forms in both healthy and sick people. These microbes kick into what modern scientists call ‘pathogens’, when the media is toxic and conducive to clean up. When you enter into a healing crisis, and your body is throwing off toxins, these “germs” appear out of your very substance, to help eliminate, process and break down these toxins. Germs have absolutely no causal relationship to disease. But germs do appear to help you clean out, because put quite simply, your disease is your cure!” – Dr. William P. Trebing – Good-Bye Germ Theory – P.154

The bright garish image on the title picture is not what a ‘virus’ looks like. These brightly coloured complex images you see on the internet or MSM are made up CGI images. This image below is showing you what ‘viruses’ look like under an electron microscope:


HIV, Hepatitis B, Measles – Images from https://www.newmedicineonline.com/viruses/
“What is it that they see under an electron microscope?

Since a virus has never been visualized under an electron microscope a methodology had to be devised in order to “extract” substances which were supposedly the result of viral activity.

Let’s use the example of Polio which was supposedly the first virus identified and then photographed under an electron microscope. What we are shown are in fact “artificial particles” which involves the complex process of suctioning an indifferent mass through a very fine filter into a vacuum which is then photographed. It is not something that is actually seen in the blood or in a tissue sample!

This form of research is highly contaminated and yet it is accepted and published in the scientific community. The question is why? Is there an agenda?” – https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-i/

(The criteria needed to identify a virus are discussed in later sections. There is also a link in the Additional Resource Section to an article about how useless the PCR tests are.)

Louis Pasteur, the most famous proponent of germ theory actually recanted it on his deathbed.

On his deathbed he said “Bernard was correct. I was wrong. The microbe (germ) is nothing. The terrain (milieu) is everything.”

He is saying that his Germ Theory is wrong and that the Terrain Theory is correct.

Many do not see Pasteur as credible and suggest he was plagiarist, dishonest and an imposter – and he clung to his theory even though much evidence disputed it – and when he had nothing to lose he admitted that his theory was false.

“Louis Pasteur was not an honest, creditable individual. If you look back into the history of the medical profession and the various ideas regarding the cause of disease that were held by leading physicians before Pasteur first promulgated his notorious “germ theory”, you will find convincing evidence that Pasteur discovered nothing, and that he deliberately appropriated, falsified and perverted another man’s work.”

https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/

GERM THEORY (PASTEUR)

The body is sterile.
Disease arises from micro-organisms outside the body.
Micro-organisms are generally to be guarded against.
The function of micro-organisms is constant.
The shapes and colours of micro-organisms are constant.
Every disease is associated with a particular micro-organism.
Micro-organisms are primary causal agents.
Disease can “strike” anybody.
To prevent disease we have to “build defences.”

TERRAIN THEORY or MICROZYMIAN THEORY or CELLULAR THEORY (BERNARD)(BÉCHAMP)

Microbes exist naturally in the body.
Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body.
These intracellular micro-organisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body.
The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical.
Micro-organisms are pleomorphic (having many forms): they change their shapes and colors (shape-shift) to reflect the condition of the host.
Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
Disease results when microbes change form, function, and toxicity according to the terrain of the host. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
To prevent disease we have to create health.



Experiments / Studies
Here are some experiments that refute the Germ Theory:

1 – Deer Island – 150 U.S. Public Health Service Experiments from 1919 prove that disease is not transmittable:

Taken from the book ‘Fasting and Man’s correct diet’ – by R.B.Pearson 1921

[media=https://youtu.be/khec-jvZx9E]

“A number of different experiments were made on 68 volunteers from US naval detention training camp on deer Island.

Several groups of men were inoculated with pure cultures of Pfeiffer’s bacillus, with secretions from the upper respiratory passages, and with blood from typical cases of influenza. About 30 men had the germs sprayed or swabbed in nose and throat.

They say of the results: “in no instance was an attack of influenza produced in any one of the subjects. “

10 more men were taken to the bedside of 10 new cases of influenza, spent 45 minutes with them, and each well man had 10 sick men cough in his face.

They say of these cases: “none of these volunteers developed any symptoms of influenza following this experiment.”

In another article the results of similar experiments in San Francisco are described.

In his experiments one group of 10 men had emulsifying cultures of Pfeiffer’s bacillus with no results in seven days observations.

Other groups of men ( 40 in all ) Received emotions of secretions from the upper respiratory passages of active cases of influenza which were instilled into nose by medicine dropper or atomizer.

Of these it says: “In every case the results were negative so far is the reproduction of influenza is concerned. The men were all observed for seven days after inoculation. “

Last, but not least, Dr. John B Fraser, in an article entitled “do germs cause disease? “In the physical culture magazine for May, 1919, says that experiments carried out in Toronto in 1911, 1912 in 1913 prove that germs only appear after the onset of the disease and goes on to say “and this fact lead to the supposition that germs were simply a by product of disease and possibly harmless “

He also describes experiments where millions of germs were fed to patients in their food, or swabbed over the tonsils and soft palate, under the tongue and in the nostrils, and still no evidence of disease was discernible.

The Germs used in the experiment included the germs of diphtheria, pneumonia, typhoid fever, meningitis and tuberculosis and no evidence of the diseases have developed in nearly 5 years.

He says: “during the years 1914 through 1918, 150 experiments were carried out carefully and scientifically and yet absolutely no signs of disease followed.”

Now this evidence refutes the idea that we can catch a virus and that there can be virus pandemics.” — The Natural Human Diet (‘Fasting and Man’s correct diet’ – by R.B.Pearson 1921)

2 – These experiments are discussed in a book by E.W. Cordingley, M.D:

“Medical doctors are working on the germ theory of disease… But the germ theory is already weakening and is due for being thrown aside. Dr. Fraser of Canada and Dr. Powell of California have experimented with billions of germs of all varieties, but they have been unable to produce a single disease by the introduction of germs into human subjects. Dr. Waite tried for years to prove the germ theory, but he could not do so. During the World War an experiment was conducted at Gallop’s Island Massachusetts, in which millions of influenza germs were injected into over one hundred men at the Government hospital, and no one got the flu. Germs are scavengers.” — Principles and Practice of Naturopathy. E.W. Cordingley, M.D.., N.D.,A.M.

3 – Boston and San Francisco – The Failed Infection Attempts – Also discussed here in the book, Virus Mania, by Torsten Engelbrecht et al

In order to be able to better assess the puzzling mass disease, an attempt to a simulated infection was undertaken with volunteers in Boston in November 1918. These were 62 healthy sailors charged with delinquency and sent to prison. They had been promised a pardon under the condition that they take part in an experiment. 39 of them had not had influenza, so the theory was that they would be particularly susceptible to infection and illness. But the results proved nothing of the sort, as American scientific journalist Gina Kolata describes in her book Influenza (Kalata, Gina, Influenza. Die Jagd nach dem Virus, Fischer, 2003):

“Navy doctors collected the mucus from men who were desperately ill from the flu, gathering thick viscous secretions from their noses and throats. They sprayed mucus from flu patients into the noses and throats of some men and dropped it into other men’s eyes. In one attempt, they swabbed mucus from the back of the nose of a man with the flu and then directly swabbed one patient’s nasal septum and rubbed it directly onto the nasal septum of one of the volunteers.

Trying to simulate what happens naturally when people are exposed to flu victims, the doctors took ten of the volunteers onto the hospital ward where men were dying of the disease. The sick men lay huddled on their narrow beds, burning with fever, drifting in and out of sleep in a delirium. The ten healthy men were given their instructions: each was to walk up to the bed of a sick man and draw near him, lean into his face, breathe in his fetid breath, and chat with him for five minutes. To be sure that the healthy man had had a full exposure to the sick man’s disease, the sick man was to exhale deeply while the healthy man drew the sick man’s breath directly into his own lungs. Finally, the flu victim coughed five times in the volunteer’s face.

Each healthy volunteer repeated these actions with ten different flu patients. Each flu patient had been seriously ill for no more than three days-a period when the virus or whatever it was that was causing the flu should still be around in his mucus, in his nose, in his lungs.

But not a single healthy man got sick.”

A comparable experiment, carried out under much stricter conditions, took place in San Francisco, with 50 imprisoned sailors. But, once again, the results did not correspond with what the doctors had expected:

“Scientists were stunned. If these healthy volunteers did not get infected with influenza despite doctors’ best efforts to make them ill, then what was causing this disease? How, exactly, did people get the flu?” – Virus Mania pages, 226-227.

https://www.biohealthworksinstitute.com/uploads/1/8/2/5/18255309/virus-mania_pdf.pdf


The original journal documenting these experiments – Public Health Reports
Here is another set of experiments discussed in Eleanor Mcbean’s book – The Poisoned Needle. Experiments by the New York State Health Department and the United States Public Health Service that showed Polio was not contagious:

“During one of our most widespread polio epidemics (1949) contraction of polio by definite contact with other victims of the disease was not established in an elaborate study made by the New York State Health Department. The United States Public Health Service in its studies also found the same negative answer during succeeding outbreaks of polio. In short, they learned that the disease was not contagious. TIME Magazine commented on this unexpected revelation of these surveys by remarking that “when and where people catch polio remains a mystery”.

The supposition that viruses entered through the mouth and nose led the experimenters to make exhaustive tests on both animals and human beings, mostly prisoners and orphans in institutions. They were exposed (by close association) to polio patients and their throats and nasal passages were frequently swabbed with matter (from the patients) that were supposed to contain viruses. No polio was produced in this way and about the only noticeable after effect was that the subjects of the experiments lost their sense of taste and smell due to the damaging effects of the poisons in the serum that was used on the swabs.” – The Poisoned Needle, by Eleanor Mcbean M.D., N.D. – Chapter 10, The Hidden Dangers in the Polio Vaccine

Polio was caused by the spraying of DDT, and then also by the vaccines that were produced.

Here is a screen grab image containing the above text, from a video called Viral Misconceptions:


This is an extract from ‘Exposing the Myth of the Germ Theory’ by Arthur M. Baker on the myth of contagion:

“Take colds for instance. How is it that infants have about eight colds per year while the parents only a few? How is it that those persons isolated at observation posts in the North and South Poles ‘catch’ colds during their stay? How is it that between 1965-67 the National Institutes of Health’s cold laboratories in Bethesda, Maryland conducted experiments that showed everything but contagion?

Volunteers were swabbed daily with supposed cold “viruses” taken directly from those suffering colds, and none became ill. More in the control group developed colds. In the meantime, shortly following traditional Thanksgiving feasts, the number of colds in both groups increased dramatically as would be expected when excessively rich food and drink is consumed during holiday festivities.

Venereal disease is also supposed to be contagious—but the socalled contagious factors (bacteria) are present because of the disease and are not the cause of the condition (and 20 per cent or so of those suffering V.D. have neither gonococcus nor spirochetes which are said
to cause it).

The US Navy conducted experiments which showed that so-called “infected persons” could not infect those termed healthy. In Japan, “infected” prostitutes had been with dozens of G.I.s, none of whom contracted the disease. Similarly, many individuals have “infections” in the genital area who have not been in contact with anyone (as seen in cases involving young children). The concept of contagion is medically unproven despite appearances to the contrary.” –http://www.homoeopathytraining.co.uk/docs%20main/downloads/Exposing%20the%20Myth%20of%20the%20GERM%20THEORY.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1yPhCz9dYhtVcKRloztiXk8JecNHp5w6Xv8e0-7-ObkS-AzCGk5AOudWg

Related article: German Supreme Court Upholds Biologist’s Claim that Measles Virus Does Not Exist:

“A recent episode in Germany created a suppressed stir in the field of microbiology when microbiologist Dr. Stefan Lanka claimed he would award anyone 100,000 Euros who could prove the existence of the measles virus.

At first it appeared he had lost. But Dr. Lanka took his loss to a higher court with more experts and the backing of two independent laboratories. He wound up not having to pay. It turned out that the “proof” provided was a composite of several different electron microscope images. And the composite involved different components of damaged cells. The composite could not be duplicated. The German Federal Supreme Court confirmed that there was not enough evidence to prove the existence of the measles virus.” – https://vaccineimpact.com/2017/german-supreme-court-upholds-biologists-claim-that-measles-virus-does-not-exist/

If they cannot prove measles exists – can they prove any viruses exist:

“Three criteria are, according to the scientific method needed to properly identify a virus.

It must be isolated from a host cell. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans.

It must be photographed and its diameter measured. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans.

It must be biochemically characterized. As of 2016 this has never been accomplished in humans.

This has never been done with any virus (herpes, hepatitis, h1n1, bird flu, swine flu, influenza, polio, measles) let alone HIV, HPV, SARS, Zika or Ebola.”- Viruses. How Much is that Dogma in the Window? – New Medicine Online –

https://www.newmedicineonline.com/viruses/

The problem for viruses was that, even into the electron microscope era, a top virologist was forced to admit that, “It is obvious that Koch’s postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases.

COVID 19 is a hoax and so are all viruses.
This is the longest piece of crap on this site
redredred · M
You win. The contest was biggest idiot with the weakest argument. Please don’t ask for any more day passes.
Ceinwyn · 26-30, F
Absolute bullshit. You are either mentally ill, deluded or clowning around.
SW-User
@Ceinwyn Well, I have well sourced medical documents and journals, information from doctors and other medical experts, books, and experiments and studies.

What do you have? Ad Hominems.

Congratulations. I love when people expose and discredit themselves and bolster my arguments. Thank you for your service.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
Whoa there Charles Dickens, I didn't sign on here to proofread your novel!
This message was deleted by its author.
I read it all!

Interesting read although I see it has been pulled from websites that many people wouldn't rely upon for information. Sources aren't cited and many of the studies are very old. Still, I would be interested into looking into it.

One thing that puzzles me, when somebody in your home gets sick and then the rest of people in the house start to get sick. Even if you're not living in the same home but were all at the same event and somebody was sick and then many of the attendees get sick with the same thing. It appears from observation that people get sick from being around sick people. Could germ theory have some truth but not be entirely true?

I will say, with covid, there didn't seen to be any rhyme or reason as to who got sick and who didn't. People who I was sure would be more susceptible to getting a bad case, and were less healthy, didn't get sick at all (even after exposures). Was that pure luck or is there more to it? I don't know.
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
@midnightrose Thanks for actually reading it all the way through. Okay so if someone in your home gets sick and then you get it, it is very simple. It is because your body is mimicking it because it needs that detox. Let me explain: Bechamp was the main scholar behind the pleomorphic theory of biology and microbiology specifically. Basically what he taught is that all biological life began (not cells, as he did not hold a cellular theory) that all biological life began with microzymas, later scholar Gaston Naessens called it somatids, and they're basically a prima materia, and your body basically whatever it needs, these microzymas granules transmute into, and thus the pleomorphic changing form, that's the idea.

So, if your body needs bacteria, the microzymas become bacteria. So, if some kind of toxin in your body needs to be eliminated, the first stage is a cold. What that is, is that your microzymas granules have changed into bacteria or you can have dormant bacteria that become alive and they try to detoxify your body. So, a cold is a bacterial detox. But if the toxic influence is too strong, then your body will create a solvent, which is now called a virus in the germ theory. Your body creates this solvent and it is basically what an exosome is. And if you look at what an exosome is, it is a circular bulb like shape and it has a corona around it. It looks exactly like what they are showing us this hoax is. It is an exosome. It is a solvent detox. Your body is creating a soap to deal with a toxin.

So, more on “Group Healing” - “Contagiousness”:

The nutritionist Aajonus Vonderplanitz explained that if the body is toxic then colds and flus will be created by the body if the climate and temperature are right, to cleanse it. He also mentions about how they can be cyclical. Here in Europe we have the cold and flu season each year. All animals bodies are stimulated in different ways by the climate and seasons… for example – to produce eggs, to molt, to grow new fur and feathers etc etc. These are not conscious acts from these animals. Why would we be any different?

From a metaphysical perspective: There is also the unseen, we also have an aura and we emit frequencies/energies…. When we are cleansing and detoxing, then our bodies most likely send off a certain frequency, if others around us are sympathetic and or empathetic to those frequencies then their red blood cells might also decide to activate a virus to cleanse, detox and heal. There is an unseen intelligence that runs through all of life, our cells seem to know if they need to detox and can be stimulated by other peoples energy to start the process.

Dr. William P. Trebing says this in the book Good-Bye Germ Theory:

“The Human body’s energy fields are more powerful than most can even imagine. When one Human body is detoxing, an almost magnetic effect radiates out from such individuals causing the same purifying effects in the immediate environment of people around them. We are not witnessing epidemics or contagious infections; we are witnessing a group healing process which is totally natural to our species.”

We can also perhaps compare it to how women all living in the same house synchronise their menstrual cycles.

This, from the video ‘Germ Theory Deception Part 2’, can also help us understand what is occurring – Alex Loglia reciting the work of Dr. Bill Holub:

“What is really happening with these supposed epidemics is the following. Actually the word epidemic from the Greek, means literally on or at and people. And means something that happens to people as a group all at once – NOT a slow contagion. The actual epidemic process is very simple – remember that everyone already has their daily compliment of germs and remember also a large population of people, such as a town or a region of a city, is continually being exposed to the same environmental hazards all at the same time. For example large numbers of people are exposed to the same weather changes, water quality changes, pesticides, foods and water, contaminated food of a fast food chain, bad news in the media, batches of drugs and medication, holiday moods, air quality changes and many other toxic insults.

The, quote on quote, group healing reaction to these toxic challenges is what you are seeing when people start coughing, sneezing or whatever. They are not catching it from each other. They are experiencing it with others. In addition, at many levels, we are all connected. About the only thing that is catching about all of this is paranoia. After all, medicine has had about a century to literally instil the fear of germs into our culture. So people fear the germs in the air, in the water – they fear germs from touching people, which, in turn leads to our general fear of people. When they read or see reports about infections going around, so to speak, the fear, paranoia and anticipation has been shown to lower ‘immunity’ and precipitate illness – now isn’t that interesting. Our self imposed stress about holidays has the same effect.”

Also read my other two posts finishing this post and elaborating on other aspects of this, which I am sure will answer many other questions you have about it.
JustAmber · 36-40, F
What about cell theory?
Zeuro · 26-30, F
ninjavu · 51-55, M
I just read the last few lines and all that I learned is that reading everything above it would be a complete waste of time. 🙄
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Oh yeah, all those people who died of covid were just crises actors *hyperbole*
Allelse · 36-40, M
You've put a lot of work into being wrong.
SW-User
Yes virus schmirus! Maybe you are the one to accompany me on my Journey to the center of the Earth!!
SW-User
@SW-User Let's go. Agartha, Mt Meru, Shambala. All compasses (come pass) point to the magnetic north pole at the center of our earth, the axis mundi. Here we come.
ElRengo · 70-79, M
What comes next?

Flat Earth?
The Ptolemaic System?
Notradamus?
The Anunaki?
SW-User
@ElRengo I have already posted a lot on the flat earth. That is the mother of all conspiracies. It makes the entire house of cards fall down. Without a globe earth you can't have the big bang, without the big bang, the theory of evolution can't even be considered, without the theory of evolution, aliens (annunaki included) seeding mankind is over. Without all of these lies, you have to turn to the creator.
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@SW-User
So, first things firts.......is Earth flat?

 
Post Comment