This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
They didn't bomb the girls' school. They bombed the army building next door without caring or holding back from killing innocents. It was outrageous. The deaths are as bad as the girls' own government killing their own people for protesting. The sick minds of those behind both make the perpetrators culpable.
Miram · 31-35, F
@FreddieUK
Currently the investgators said it was one of the three:
1- Direct strike on the compound and the school sharing walls.
2- Different strikes on military buildings next to it that also hit the school.
3- Misidentification of the school as part of the IRGC facility and direct strikes.
They also discussed the possibility of double strike on the school.
Regardless of the preferred word...they have bombed the school. And killed the students who were studying there.
I don't care if they didn't intend for it to be the school. This isn't the first civilian bombing committed by the US. We didn't mean it doesn't cut it anymore.
Currently the investgators said it was one of the three:
1- Direct strike on the compound and the school sharing walls.
2- Different strikes on military buildings next to it that also hit the school.
3- Misidentification of the school as part of the IRGC facility and direct strikes.
They also discussed the possibility of double strike on the school.
Regardless of the preferred word...they have bombed the school. And killed the students who were studying there.
I don't care if they didn't intend for it to be the school. This isn't the first civilian bombing committed by the US. We didn't mean it doesn't cut it anymore.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@Miram
I hope nothing in what I wrote leads you to believe that in any way I was excusing this atrocity. I am listening live to the latest BBC report which is quite clear that they have identified the missile as US and that the building it fell on was an IRGC facility. The school is adjacent. I just like accuracy.
We didn't mean it doesn't cut it anymore.
I hope nothing in what I wrote leads you to believe that in any way I was excusing this atrocity. I am listening live to the latest BBC report which is quite clear that they have identified the missile as US and that the building it fell on was an IRGC facility. The school is adjacent. I just like accuracy.
Miram · 31-35, F
@FreddieUK
I checked again and you're wrong.
Based on what investigators and analysts have said so far, it does not look like the school was only damaged by an adjacent strike.
The evidence to military investigators suggests the strike pattern involved multiple impact points in the area, and at least one munition appears to have hit the school building itself, not just the nearby facility IRGC..
So me calling it a bombing of school is not being inaccurate. You can google the investigations and check too.
I checked again and you're wrong.
Based on what investigators and analysts have said so far, it does not look like the school was only damaged by an adjacent strike.
The evidence to military investigators suggests the strike pattern involved multiple impact points in the area, and at least one munition appears to have hit the school building itself, not just the nearby facility IRGC..
So me calling it a bombing of school is not being inaccurate. You can google the investigations and check too.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
I've checked the BBC site and they tell me that a US Tomahawk missile hit the building next to the school. They also report that there were other bombings in the vicinity and on that same building. Whatever, the girls were innocent victims of inhumanity. 🙁




