Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Weak teachers...strong pupils?

When I was at high school we had a serious problem with vandalism, like the other kids knew who it was and told the teachers, but without proof there was nothing they could do about it. Kids were smashing up windows, science labs etc. Then just laughing about it. People considered the head teacher to be weak and wishy-washy and some kids were fed up and took matters into their own hands.

One kid got some other kids together, they were 11 - 12, to do something about it.
They caught a 13 year old vandal on a bus one Saturday. They cuffed him and took him off the bus, as one of those kids had a dad that was a cop. Everyone was laughing, the bus driver, the other passengers, the kids and even the vandal! They took him off not at his stop but as theirs and the driver laughed and said "kids" to the other passengers.

So they took him to one of their homes and handcuffed him, in the basement, to an old iron rad. That must have weighed a ton! They left him his writing hand and a pad and a pen and told him to write a confession.

they left him for hours, checking up and finally they went in about 9pm. The vandal was red eyed from crying and had written a confession to breaking the school windows. But was told that his confession meant nothing if he wasn't a) sorry and b) didn't sign it. He did both and they told him to see the head teacher on Monday morning.

He did. The hold asked him why he confessed and he said he felt guilty. I think the teacher was both amused and bemused at that and told the kid he would have to pay for the damage!

After word got out about what happened to that vandal loads of kids were confessing to the head teacher. At one assembly he said he felt like a priest taking confession!

Were the kids right to deal with this problem? Or should they have just left it to the adults and teachers?
Top | New | Old
MsSwan Best Comment
They probably should've left it to the adults, but it's cool that they didn't.
Wol62 · 51-55, M
@MsSwan Yeah, they did leave it to the adults but felt that without evidence they could not act. They knew who was doing it and just needed the vandal to sign a confession. They just laughed that he acted tough but then cried when he realised what was happening to him.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Wol62 · 51-55, M
@Rilyn Bless you! You are so very kind and good.
Rilyn · 31-35, F
@Wol62 🙏
Wol62 · 51-55, M
@Rilyn Yeah I would have left it to the adults.
HoraceGreenley · 61-69, M
Frontier justice
If the law won't handle it...do it yourself
Wol62 · 51-55, M
@HoraceGreenley Well...that...that is what they did.
Gloomy · F
That's kinda fucked up
Wol62 · 51-55, M
@Gloomy That is true, the worst that came from it i the vandal paid for the damages and the vandalism stopped.
Gloomy · F
@Wol62 are you sure? Did people check the mental wellbeing of the vandal? Cause vandalism can have a reason beyond just silly puberty stuff and being locked in a basement can leave scars for life.
Wol62 · 51-55, M
@Gloomy Nope I don't think they did, you are correct about that part, there was no follow up...

 
Post Comment