This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
1-25 of 55
@SandWitch fair point. 😂
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@in10RjFox
[quote] There is no shopping. It's like You just avail the nearest toilet to relieve the urge and may never get the opportunity to go again.[/quote]
All this higher intellect coming from a guy who not only doesn't do one night stands, but also from the same guy who last dated during the pre-internet era.
Thanks Foxy, but if I need any advice on dating, I'll roll the dice and Google it!
[quote] There is no shopping. It's like You just avail the nearest toilet to relieve the urge and may never get the opportunity to go again.[/quote]
All this higher intellect coming from a guy who not only doesn't do one night stands, but also from the same guy who last dated during the pre-internet era.
Thanks Foxy, but if I need any advice on dating, I'll roll the dice and Google it!
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@in10RjFox
[quote]Philosophy is like that my dear .. think deep and you would know. And it's not my date .. it's one for the other.[/quote]
But your's is not deep philosophical thinking, Foxy so why would you tell @OliRos to "think deep"?!
If you actually understood the Webster's definition of a one night stand that I presented earlier to this thread, you would also understand that a one night stand has nothing to do with dating! 🙄
[quote]Philosophy is like that my dear .. think deep and you would know. And it's not my date .. it's one for the other.[/quote]
But your's is not deep philosophical thinking, Foxy so why would you tell @OliRos to "think deep"?!
If you actually understood the Webster's definition of a one night stand that I presented earlier to this thread, you would also understand that a one night stand has nothing to do with dating! 🙄
in10RjFox · M
@SandWitch just by saying that something is not deep doesn't make it shallow. And what do you know about philosophy to say it's not philosophical thinking ? So why not say something philosophical to prove that you know philosophy.
And who the hell said ONS has anything to do with dating. Shows that you didn't understand what I presented.
And to understand Webster, it's not called a definition because they are not authority to define it. It's just an explanation of their understanding of ONS based on how people use it. Hope you know it's a colloquial expression.😜
And who the hell said ONS has anything to do with dating. Shows that you didn't understand what I presented.
And to understand Webster, it's not called a definition because they are not authority to define it. It's just an explanation of their understanding of ONS based on how people use it. Hope you know it's a colloquial expression.😜
@in10RjFox a living language is fluid. but that doesn’t make what she said wrong, necessarily. And I happen to know a very good deal about philosophy but that’s a rabbit hole that can lose days if not more.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@DarkHeaven
I wouldn't waste any more time attempting to infuse rational thought into this guy's mind, DarkHeaven. Please keep in mind that @in10RjFox has a very long history of abusive misogyny that he takes great pleasure at imposing on women he encounters here on SW, so the topic of this thread's discussion is actually not what's at issue here.
I wouldn't waste any more time attempting to infuse rational thought into this guy's mind, DarkHeaven. Please keep in mind that @in10RjFox has a very long history of abusive misogyny that he takes great pleasure at imposing on women he encounters here on SW, so the topic of this thread's discussion is actually not what's at issue here.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SandWitch · 26-30, F
@Lilliesandlight
[quote]trial and error...free trial? Satisfaction ain't guaranteed so you can at least have an easy return. It's like Amazon 😂[/quote]
Yes very true! That's how I look at it! A free 30 day no-obligation trial.... or if beyond 30 days, only an exchanged is offered for a different size or color for the next 10 days only!
[quote]trial and error...free trial? Satisfaction ain't guaranteed so you can at least have an easy return. It's like Amazon 😂[/quote]
Yes very true! That's how I look at it! A free 30 day no-obligation trial.... or if beyond 30 days, only an exchanged is offered for a different size or color for the next 10 days only!
in10RjFox · M
@DarkHeaven [quote] A living language is fluid. but that doesn’t make what she said wrong, necessarily. And I happen to know a very good deal about philosophy but that’s a rabbit hole that can lose days if not more.[/quote]
First, learn the art of expression and have some commitment while writing. You are writing for others and not for yourself. So learn the art of substantiating well while writing. What can anyone make out from your two statements, when both are incomplete and just a burp?
Yes, the word definition for ONS is wrong. If it's a rabbit hole, then why mention it? Just knowing a good deal doesn't make you a philosopher. Only touts get to know of deals and sell them to others because they have no use for it.
If you happen to know a good deal, then take it yourself.
First, learn the art of expression and have some commitment while writing. You are writing for others and not for yourself. So learn the art of substantiating well while writing. What can anyone make out from your two statements, when both are incomplete and just a burp?
Yes, the word definition for ONS is wrong. If it's a rabbit hole, then why mention it? Just knowing a good deal doesn't make you a philosopher. Only touts get to know of deals and sell them to others because they have no use for it.
If you happen to know a good deal, then take it yourself.
@in10RjFox
[quote]And to understand Webster, it's not called a definition because they are not authority to define it. It's just an explanation of their understanding of ONS based on how people use it. Hope you know it's a colloquial expression[/quote]
Who doesn’t have commitment to substantiating well while writing?
You literally argued her point by not arguing her point. You let her know that her understanding of a ONS is wrong because it’s a colloquial expression that may or may not be defined by Webster’s as they are not an authority. But neither are you, so you ended up with a large word vomit that ended up saying nothing about nothing. Good job.
[quote]What can anyone make out from your two statements, when both are incomplete and just a burp?[/quote]
I was pretty clear as compared with your statements but we’ll just parse them out and see, why don’t we.
[quote]A living language is fluid. but that doesn’t make what she said wrong, necessarily.[/quote]
My statement argues that as much as a living language is fluid (colloquialisms,) that does not disprove her explanation based on Webster’s understanding of the word based on how people use it, so I’m explaining why your entire comment made little sense and also added nothing of value to the reply.
[quote]And I happen to know a very good deal about philosophy but that’s a rabbit hole that can lose days if not more.[/quote]
So why bring it up? I didn’t. You did. I merely explained what a waste of time philosophy would be as it’s largely irrelevant and just adds further confusion to your already confusing word vomit reply.
I do write well but perhaps you could take some time in both learning to read and write well, so that you can be more succinct and less pointless in future endeavors, since you also write for others and not yourself. Good luck with that.
[quote]And to understand Webster, it's not called a definition because they are not authority to define it. It's just an explanation of their understanding of ONS based on how people use it. Hope you know it's a colloquial expression[/quote]
Who doesn’t have commitment to substantiating well while writing?
You literally argued her point by not arguing her point. You let her know that her understanding of a ONS is wrong because it’s a colloquial expression that may or may not be defined by Webster’s as they are not an authority. But neither are you, so you ended up with a large word vomit that ended up saying nothing about nothing. Good job.
[quote]What can anyone make out from your two statements, when both are incomplete and just a burp?[/quote]
I was pretty clear as compared with your statements but we’ll just parse them out and see, why don’t we.
[quote]A living language is fluid. but that doesn’t make what she said wrong, necessarily.[/quote]
My statement argues that as much as a living language is fluid (colloquialisms,) that does not disprove her explanation based on Webster’s understanding of the word based on how people use it, so I’m explaining why your entire comment made little sense and also added nothing of value to the reply.
[quote]And I happen to know a very good deal about philosophy but that’s a rabbit hole that can lose days if not more.[/quote]
So why bring it up? I didn’t. You did. I merely explained what a waste of time philosophy would be as it’s largely irrelevant and just adds further confusion to your already confusing word vomit reply.
I do write well but perhaps you could take some time in both learning to read and write well, so that you can be more succinct and less pointless in future endeavors, since you also write for others and not yourself. Good luck with that.
in10RjFox · M
@DarkHeaven [quote]You literally argued her point by not arguing her point. You let her know that her understanding of a [b]OST [/b]is wrong because it’s a colloquial expression [/quote]
And now what is OST ?
[quote]So why bring it up? I didn’t. You did. I merely explained what a waste of time philosophy would be as it’s largely irrelevant [/quote]
Good.. so which part is the philosophy that I brought up?
And now what is OST ?
[quote]So why bring it up? I didn’t. You did. I merely explained what a waste of time philosophy would be as it’s largely irrelevant [/quote]
Good.. so which part is the philosophy that I brought up?
@in10RjFox when you begin to pick at an obvious simple mistype in which everyone knows the subject being discussed, it’s clear that you no longer have anything left to say of any substantive value and are now just commenting in an effort to pretend that you do. I’ll allow you to get back to your learning how to read and write well for all future endeavors here. Good luck.
in10RjFox · M
@DarkHeaven And now you blame me for your mistakes and mistypes. So remember to be careful with your words when the matter gets serious, for everything that you say reflects on you. And don't be casual and make casual comments or loose talk, especially in a forum, as everything you say gets registered, which you cannot take back or roll back. OST is in no way a mistype for ONS, and you cannot insist that others consider it a mistype.
I don't lament but stick to the subject. I just wanted to check your seriousness as you were just firing blanks, and when questioned, you fire more blanks. So rather than advocating rules of how to play the game, stick to playing the game.
You said I was the one who brought in Philosophy and that it is a waste of time.. So I tested your ground by asking which part, as the Philosophy part, that I brought in, for I sensed that you just came in defense without a clue of what the philosophy part is.
I don't lament but stick to the subject. I just wanted to check your seriousness as you were just firing blanks, and when questioned, you fire more blanks. So rather than advocating rules of how to play the game, stick to playing the game.
You said I was the one who brought in Philosophy and that it is a waste of time.. So I tested your ground by asking which part, as the Philosophy part, that I brought in, for I sensed that you just came in defense without a clue of what the philosophy part is.
@in10RjFox
[quote]Philosophy is like that my dear .. think deep and you would know. And it's not my date .. it's one for the other.
[/quote]
[quote]just by saying that something is not deep doesn't make it shallow. And what do you know about philosophy to say it's not philosophical thinking ? So why not say something philosophical to prove that you know philosophy.[/quote]
[quote]ONS is like going to a bridal boutique and wearing a wedding dress to picture oneself like a bride, and exit without ordering any. Comparison shopping is different.
Philosophy is not your subject.. you suck!.[/quote]
You really didn’t provide any sort of substantive philosophical lines of thought, any more than you provided anything else of value in this entire conversation… but you did bandy the word around quite a bit as evidenced in the replies that I have provided here.
[quote]Philosophy is like that my dear .. think deep and you would know. And it's not my date .. it's one for the other.
[/quote]
[quote]just by saying that something is not deep doesn't make it shallow. And what do you know about philosophy to say it's not philosophical thinking ? So why not say something philosophical to prove that you know philosophy.[/quote]
[quote]ONS is like going to a bridal boutique and wearing a wedding dress to picture oneself like a bride, and exit without ordering any. Comparison shopping is different.
Philosophy is not your subject.. you suck!.[/quote]
You really didn’t provide any sort of substantive philosophical lines of thought, any more than you provided anything else of value in this entire conversation… but you did bandy the word around quite a bit as evidenced in the replies that I have provided here.
1-25 of 55