Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Islam was NOT spread by sword !

Many people say: “Islam was spread by sword”
but if we analyze that claim,
What does it mean though ?
It means that any land where Muslims ruled , there was “forced conversion into Islam”
But historically, that is for the most part proven to be untrue.
First of all ,
The Islamic law prohibits forced conversions, following the Quranic principle that there is "no compulsion in religion" (Quran 2:256)
That is why there is jizya taxes for non Muslims living in Muslim lands and enjoying the rights and protection (likewise Muslims also pitch in in society but they pay what is called “Zakah alms” and by the way , it’s higher than jizya!) the sole existence of jizya contradicts the claim that Islam allows forced conversions of people.

Moreover;
After the time of prophet Mohammed ,
When the Muslims took control of Egypt
No church was destroyed or jew or Christian was forced into Islam
A great population of Egypt today is still Christian dating all the way back from the time where Muslims got control of Egypt.

Similar thing when Muslims got control of Jerusalem
Not only no Jew or Christian were forced into Islam but church key was given to a Muslim man to protect it from any harm!

And the same thing when Muslims got control of
Spain (Andalus )
Not only no Jew or Christian etc were forced into Islam
But the Muslims were the minority for many decades and centuries !
Imagine a Muslim kingdom yet Muslims being the minority ! It took centuries for the Muslim population to increase in al Andalus and it’s all in historical records with numbers.
If there was forced conversions , the whole nation would have been Muslim overnight.
To prove this ,
when the Christians took control of Spain from the Muslims , the Christian Spaniards
They killed and tortured every Jew and Muslim who refused to become Christian
And kicked out many
(Spanish equestian)
The Muslim and Jew population decreased dramatically with the blink of an eye.
Similer thing if we look at the crusaders and forced conversions in South America and America etc..


Last but not least,
Many lands became Muslim with no Muslim ruler coming to rule it
Best example is Indonesia !
it has the largest Muslim population in the world yet it was never conquered. the Indonesians converted to Islam by Muslim traders and their morals.

Also the people of Maldives are almost 100% Muslim yet no Muslim army ever went there.
and many other endless lands have the same story.

Im not saying that there weren’t minor forced conversions in history done by Muslims
But doesn’t mean it’s the law of Islam nor what was practiced in the big picture. Just like not everyone follow traffic lights that doesn’t mean there is something wrong with the traffic lights themselves.

So someone who goes around and says “Islam was spread by sword/force “ seems to me like a Parrot repeating what they hear with no understanding.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Budwick · 70-79, M
More recent history often tells a much darker tale.


I think Islam could help itself greatly if the alleged 90% of peaceful Muslims were to soundly shut down the 10% of whack-a-doodles.

Islam has a major public relations problem on it's hand.
@Budwick kkk Clans still exist and Christian extremists 🙃
Also extremis Hindus in India
Bombing mosques and killing muslims and bullying them

I think you ignored the one before last statement in my post
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Islamreligion
I think you ignored the last statement in my post

And I think you ignored mine.

Islam has a major public relations problem on it's hand.

That's not the fault of the KKK, Christians or Hindus.
That is reality.
@Budwick “That's not the fault of the KKK”

so you agree with the actions of kkk which is a terrorist organization and their actions are illegal ?
They did horrible things to non Christians.
Or the
Or extremist Hindus who attack innocent Muslims ?
What a violent mindset
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Islamreligion Focus Islam -
Islam has a major public relations problem on it's hand.

THAT is the issue you would like to resolve, isn't it?
@Budwick “islam has major public relations problem “ Islam has no location
Muslims are everywhere
Turkey Indonesia Maldives uae Egypt uk Kuwait qatar france Pakistan usa Etc

Usa was just begging Saudi Arabia the other day to reduce oil prices
So I wouldn’t worry much about public relations.

my issue is with you not viewing kkk and other terrorist groups as terrorists
So only so called extremist Muslims are terrorists? The double standards amaze me
@Budwick it is funny how when someone cannot attack Islam
They say “see what that Muslim does”
As if the actions of individuals is a criteria to judge Islam.
It is like judging the accuracy of traffic lights
By seeing if all people follow it or not.
There will always be people who do not abide by the laws.

Forced conversions is prohibited clearly in Quran and authentic hadeeth
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Islamreligion

Forced conversions is prohibited clearly in Quran and authentic hadeeth

Cool.
Then why not take out your frustration over Islam being misunderstood on the ones causing it - Radical Muslims.

To the uninitiated, Islam appears to be violent and coercive, because of the very public display of violent, coercive Muslims. The world has spent untold amounts of blood and treasure to fight these knotweeds. The rest of Islam has been pretty quiet, except in situations like this post of yours, trying to make a case that Islam is not violent. It doesn't sell, it isn't believable.

@Budwick
The capstone of the qur'anic case for religious liberty is the fact that not even the Prophet Muhammad could impose or force people to profess Islam. When people were unreceptive to the message of Islam, the Qur'an explicitly reminded him that he was never to resort to coercion: "Your task is only to exhort; you cannot compel them [to believe]" (88:21). Evidence from Islamic history suggests that this view was held not only by Prophet Muhammad but also by his political successors. In one recorded example, an elderly Christian woman came to see the caliph Umar and then refused his invitation to embrace Islam. He became anxious that she might have perceived his invitation as compulsion. "O my Lord," he said, expressing his remorse, "I have not intended to compel her, as I know that there must be no compulsion in religion ... [R]ighteousness has been explained and distinguished from misguidance
the Qur'an says much to undercut such restrictions. On a practical level, it repeatedly emphasises the role of the Prophet as teaching people about God rather than forcing them to convert to Islam. "The Apostle is not bound to do more than clearly deliver the message [entrusted to him]" (24:54). Similarly, it urges readers to "pay heed, then, unto God and pay heed unto the Apostle; and if you turn away, [know that] Our Apostle's only duty is a clear delivery of this message" (64:12)
Budwick · 70-79, M
@Islamreligion Terrific!
Now, tell that to radical Islam!
@Budwick yes im glad you find it terrific ~
that is radical.
Not what media been saying after 9/11
Im sure islam wasn’t born in 9/11
You should worry about the American government who swears on the Bible and then goes and kills 2 million innocent people in iraq
Kids babies women etc
Go look up the statics
Bombed hospitals schools neighborhoods etc
But no funny what we choose to define as terrorism and what we decide to ignore.

Have a good day
I won’t reply anymore
But check one message foundation on YouTube it refutes your claims
If you are interested in an answer.