This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Budwick · 70-79, M
Government isn't recognizing religion as an exemption anyway.
I'd lean on previous suprement court decision - the Supreme Court noted in its 1992 Riggins V. Nevada decision that “the forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty.”
I'd lean on previous suprement court decision - the Supreme Court noted in its 1992 Riggins V. Nevada decision that “the forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty.”