If you pick love, then passion goes along with it. You cannot have true love without passion.

If you pick passion only, and because you're separating the two, I assume you mean sexual passion, then you've already decided that you don't want love. In this case, you're probably not going to be able to experience the upper boundaries of passion, and none of the closeness that comes with love.

@Curious - Love is also chemical

Passion is overrated

If you pick love without passion then it can't be a romantic love, the 2 are intertwined. It can only be a loving friendship or family.
Passion without love is OK short term. It quickly tarnishes and becomes boring.

Love without romantic passion happens every single day.
I love my granddaughter, friends, and family.
For me romantic love without passion in platonic at best, boring as hell at worst.

I'd pick love with no passion. It's been a long time since I've had passion, but the love of friends is still there. That's what counts, for me anyway.

@Quizling I disagree. I believe that attraction is chemical, but love is something more. Something we don't understand yet.

Ain't they both connected?.. without passion there is no love... Love means passion is moving and evolving

Passion is fleeting and chemical, love is worth more.

I would consider either to be a bonus... One is better than none, lol

I'm a passionate person and I believe you can have both.

I have never felt love without passion or vice versa

@Quizling lol yeah hahaha it's French haven't thought of that :D

Well, that's a sucky choice. I want both.

Aha! Hmmmmmmmm ohlala Love!

@Jade - French love? :p

👍 @Quizling

Passion

love

Love!!

@Jade - Isn't "Ooh la la" a stereotypical French exclamation?

What's a French love @Quiz