Women aren’t wired for open relationships?
[http://news.nationalpost.com/arts/celebrity/lean-into-your-biology-big-bang-theorys-mayim-bialik-says-women-arent-wired-for-open-relationships]
Makes sense....
Makes sense....
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
Some of them are bound to be. Out of billions. And, they also claim that women cheat the most, if i recall--though, its difficult to measure. What isnt sifficult to measure is how often women initiate divorce. 70-80% of the time when divorce happens, it was initiated by the woman, if i recall.
Either way, its beneficial to both men and women to have multiple partners. But, women aren't really suited to monogamy, either, given the aforementioned. I would tend to believe they're more suited to polyamory or serial monogamy more so than true monogamy--as are most males. In general.
Only, polyamory is severely looked down on. And illegal in many parts. Monogamy is socially and legally enforced. And women are also much more influenced by social influence than men are, particularly influence from other women. For instance, this is why women have hard ons for married men and men who are taken. It shows them that a woman has deemed him valuable and worth risking eggs for. "He must have *something*, otherwise a woman wouldn't be interestd in him that much."
If one woman disdains the idea of multiple partners, it has a domino effect, as women form a sense of solidarity, as women. They identify with other women simply on the premise that they are also women, which is something men dont do--we have to have ideological or rational similarities or other kinds of ties. Simply also being men doesn't mean anything.
So, there are multiple levels which need examining. Social, physical, mental, and emotional. All of which can be mutually exclusive or inclusive, which severely complicates matters. As is true with all human behavior.
Ultimately, idfk. But, at minimum, humans are naturally closer to polyamory than true monogamy. Otherwise we, both men and women, wouldn't have an average of 10-15 sexual partners over a lifetime.
Either way, its beneficial to both men and women to have multiple partners. But, women aren't really suited to monogamy, either, given the aforementioned. I would tend to believe they're more suited to polyamory or serial monogamy more so than true monogamy--as are most males. In general.
Only, polyamory is severely looked down on. And illegal in many parts. Monogamy is socially and legally enforced. And women are also much more influenced by social influence than men are, particularly influence from other women. For instance, this is why women have hard ons for married men and men who are taken. It shows them that a woman has deemed him valuable and worth risking eggs for. "He must have *something*, otherwise a woman wouldn't be interestd in him that much."
If one woman disdains the idea of multiple partners, it has a domino effect, as women form a sense of solidarity, as women. They identify with other women simply on the premise that they are also women, which is something men dont do--we have to have ideological or rational similarities or other kinds of ties. Simply also being men doesn't mean anything.
So, there are multiple levels which need examining. Social, physical, mental, and emotional. All of which can be mutually exclusive or inclusive, which severely complicates matters. As is true with all human behavior.
Ultimately, idfk. But, at minimum, humans are naturally closer to polyamory than true monogamy. Otherwise we, both men and women, wouldn't have an average of 10-15 sexual partners over a lifetime.
@IrretrievableObito: that's bullshit. If women cheat, it's not because they are polygamous by nature. It's because the men they are with are assholes and women need emotional connection. So if they find a man that emotionally connect with them, they don't let him go. If their husbands are emotionally disconnected from them, yeah they will want to cheat.
Women are not more inclined to having multitude of partners nor 10-15 sexual partners. Some will only have under five, some luckier ones will have one for the rest of their life.
Women are not more inclined to having multitude of partners nor 10-15 sexual partners. Some will only have under five, some luckier ones will have one for the rest of their life.
Tatsumi · 31-35, M
@thinkbigaboutlife: Yes, yes. Typical sexist feminist drivel. "Men are animals; women are angels." Women are superior and perfect, right. Pure-hearted angels.
"Emotional connection" for women is simply an internal measurement of male value vs egg value. Meaning, female loyalty falls far below male loyalty. It is shallow. Because, as you say, women seek that emotional connection. So, if they find a better one [e.g. a more valuable male, in whatever way she measures: money, status, etc], they either cheat or trade up. Thus the high rate of female-initiated divorce. It's scientific fact, for instance, that women have many more orgasms with rich men. That's what women are born to seek.
Its not because males are assholes. Its because women are self-absorbed assholes.
Female love is superficial and self-serving, entirely based upon the resources she receives. In general. "Till death do us part, or until i find a better guy." In general. Contrasted to male love which is measured in sweat, tears, and blood.
If we really want to play the gender superiority game--as you seem to want to--then you should integrate the hundreds of thousands of men, arguably hundreds of millions, who have died for women. Try finding a woman who would die for her lover. You'll be looking a long time. But one quick Google search, and you'll find a hundred men who died for their wives or girlfriends.
Given the way you write, even if a man died for you on the spot, you'd probably still call him an asshole.
Women are not somehow glorious creatures of angelic purity. They're human. Just like the rest of us. So get the fuck off your high horse and join us in reality. Blaming men for everything. Do you have any sense of personal responsibility? Do you really think that not one instance of divorce or female-cheating was initiated because a woman was like, "later bitch, I'm gonna fuck a rich guy." Or, "I only married you so i could divorce you and take half your shit."? No? It's all because men are assholes. Ooookay. Someone is astoundingly biased.
Pff. At least read correctly. "Humans have an average of 10-15 sexual partners over a lifetime." At least understand what you're arguing against, before you make an even bigger fool out of yourself.
"Emotional connection" for women is simply an internal measurement of male value vs egg value. Meaning, female loyalty falls far below male loyalty. It is shallow. Because, as you say, women seek that emotional connection. So, if they find a better one [e.g. a more valuable male, in whatever way she measures: money, status, etc], they either cheat or trade up. Thus the high rate of female-initiated divorce. It's scientific fact, for instance, that women have many more orgasms with rich men. That's what women are born to seek.
Its not because males are assholes. Its because women are self-absorbed assholes.
Female love is superficial and self-serving, entirely based upon the resources she receives. In general. "Till death do us part, or until i find a better guy." In general. Contrasted to male love which is measured in sweat, tears, and blood.
If we really want to play the gender superiority game--as you seem to want to--then you should integrate the hundreds of thousands of men, arguably hundreds of millions, who have died for women. Try finding a woman who would die for her lover. You'll be looking a long time. But one quick Google search, and you'll find a hundred men who died for their wives or girlfriends.
Given the way you write, even if a man died for you on the spot, you'd probably still call him an asshole.
Women are not somehow glorious creatures of angelic purity. They're human. Just like the rest of us. So get the fuck off your high horse and join us in reality. Blaming men for everything. Do you have any sense of personal responsibility? Do you really think that not one instance of divorce or female-cheating was initiated because a woman was like, "later bitch, I'm gonna fuck a rich guy." Or, "I only married you so i could divorce you and take half your shit."? No? It's all because men are assholes. Ooookay. Someone is astoundingly biased.
Pff. At least read correctly. "Humans have an average of 10-15 sexual partners over a lifetime." At least understand what you're arguing against, before you make an even bigger fool out of yourself.
You are wrong on many accounts, you are not worth my time for me to go into detail as to where and how you are wrong. Anyway, you seem to have a big chip on your shoulder against women. And fyi, I have never said women are superior to men, or men superior to women, but that is the way you have interpreted so that says a lot about you and your weak points. I don't know about your country, but in my country lots and lots of women are educated and financially stable. Blocking you as you are a complete asshole who is narcissistic and on here simply for an argument with others. Get a heart and stop putting all women in the same low category! Go to hell.
@IrretrievableObito: 🤢 - for you. you make me want to throw up.