what do you think about interracial relationships
i'm Caucasian and i don't agree with it., i think people should stick to their own race. i've always thought that, nowadays IR is a very common thing.
46-50, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BohoBabe · M
If it's about preserving the white race, interracial relationships aren't really a threat. There are more white people alive today than at any other point in history, and interracial marriages are still pretty rare. The big threat to the white race is pollution.
Also, WMAF raceplay is hot.
Also, WMAF raceplay is hot.
Magicianzini · M
@BohoBabe As of 2025, 19% of all new marriages are interracial. Also, people procreate more out of wedlock than within it these days.
BohoBabe · M
@Magicianzini That's only in America. The rate is much much less in other countries. Also, America is kinda weird with race. White people are often classified as non-white if they're Hispanic or Middle Eastern. A lot of surveys will say that interracial marriage is up, but then say the most common mix is White and Hispanic. My guess is that the number is less than 19%.
Magicianzini · M
@BohoBabe
It's probably just higher considering peoples' self-classification. If we include all unions, not just of wedlock, we're probably looking more around 40-45% at this time. You may be older, but I'm around a lot of young and they are mixing like crazy🤣🤣
Also, it make sense the rates would be lower in (most) other countries since the populations are more homogeneous. That will change more slowly ... except of course in Europe, which is less homogeneous and is changing almost as fast as the US (and faster in some regions.) I also can't agree that Natives or Semites are Caucasian, although I know in the US they used to often be considered to be in metropolitan areas... but metro areas aren't most areas.
Anyone concerned about "preserving" the white race (or any other race for that matter) is kidding themselves. Humans have been mixed for far too long now.
It's probably just higher considering peoples' self-classification. If we include all unions, not just of wedlock, we're probably looking more around 40-45% at this time. You may be older, but I'm around a lot of young and they are mixing like crazy🤣🤣
Also, it make sense the rates would be lower in (most) other countries since the populations are more homogeneous. That will change more slowly ... except of course in Europe, which is less homogeneous and is changing almost as fast as the US (and faster in some regions.) I also can't agree that Natives or Semites are Caucasian, although I know in the US they used to often be considered to be in metropolitan areas... but metro areas aren't most areas.
Anyone concerned about "preserving" the white race (or any other race for that matter) is kidding themselves. Humans have been mixed for far too long now.
BohoBabe · M
@Magicianzini I'm pretty young. I do see mixing, but it's still the exception, not the rule. Plus I've lived in America and Germany, it's much more rare in Europe.
Europe is only becoming multiracial in the big cities, which was bound to happen. Keep in mind, most immigration in Europe is between European countries. And while migrants tend to have higher birthrates, their birthrates drop as they assimilate.
So if an Arab has the European phenotype, you wouldn't consider that person white? Why not?
Well it depends how you view race. If you believe in the one-drop rule, then the white race is already extinct. I care more about phenotypes. If a white person is like 6% black, I'm still going to consider them white.
Europe is only becoming multiracial in the big cities, which was bound to happen. Keep in mind, most immigration in Europe is between European countries. And while migrants tend to have higher birthrates, their birthrates drop as they assimilate.
So if an Arab has the European phenotype, you wouldn't consider that person white? Why not?
Well it depends how you view race. If you believe in the one-drop rule, then the white race is already extinct. I care more about phenotypes. If a white person is like 6% black, I'm still going to consider them white.
Magicianzini · M
@BohoBabe
Yes, it's definitely not the rule ... well, in most areas. There are some select areas where I've met many who claim it is. Usually metros, usually the very young (adolescent). Migrants having lower birthrates as assimilating isn't what I've seen in the US. Many never even assimilate. Still, kids are expensive and I could see that being the expected result. I would need to study the stats on that though.
Arabs are Semites, there are no European phenotypes to this. We may have differing ideas of what an Arab is. That would be the only variation. And why not? The same reason I couldn't consider anyone else who wasn't white to be white or someone who wasn't black to be black etc.
That's an interesting POV. It makes me wonder where your percentage "cut-off" would land LMAO until you considered someone something else other than one race specifically ... because of course there must be a cut-off point if you, yourself, have these definitions.
Yes, it's definitely not the rule ... well, in most areas. There are some select areas where I've met many who claim it is. Usually metros, usually the very young (adolescent). Migrants having lower birthrates as assimilating isn't what I've seen in the US. Many never even assimilate. Still, kids are expensive and I could see that being the expected result. I would need to study the stats on that though.
Arabs are Semites, there are no European phenotypes to this. We may have differing ideas of what an Arab is. That would be the only variation. And why not? The same reason I couldn't consider anyone else who wasn't white to be white or someone who wasn't black to be black etc.
That's an interesting POV. It makes me wonder where your percentage "cut-off" would land LMAO until you considered someone something else other than one race specifically ... because of course there must be a cut-off point if you, yourself, have these definitions.