Only if she showed the potential to learn. Most people don't have to learn, even university graduates, we dumbed everything down alot even when studying to be a physicians assistant.
Will Durant was best known for his introduction to The Story of Philosophy (a rather shallow introduction book I've had morons quote religiously to me), but wrote on the history of ideas encyclopedically.
He married one of his pupils, she was so into him she adopted her pet name for him legally as her first name (sorry mom and dad), and went on to help him in his research. He eventually started to co-credit her, and she in time became a writer in her own right.
Such a endeavor is risky. It means a person exploring a high level of individualization and breaking with ideologies and beliefs of the past on a very personal level, and you can't guide them towards what you think is best. You can state what you believe, but you have to hold alot back so as not to mess with the authenticity of the process. If you are not having run ins that don't risk the relationship from her suddenly questioning stuff, you are likely doing it wrong. You're trying to create a advanced and creative individual, not a mere extention of yourself. The same bonds and methods used for consulations may no longer work.
If a INTJ like myself met a INTJ woman, it sould be a very, very stable relationship and I wouldn't have to worry about things like if I'm taking advantage of her because she thinks cheetos are a fruit. Pretty much anyone else, and I'll demand a certain level of life experience (not wealth or success, just progress and maturity) and intelligence, or at least show evidence for the spark of it present. I'm otheriwse not impressed beyond the physical level. And I wouldn't consider a dumb (no potential), physically unattractive woman. I could go with a plain but intellectually mature woman, but I can't mix stupid with no looks. That's just definately not happening, nothing at all for me in that.
