This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are men necessary?

Poll - Total Votes: 21
Men are absolutely necessary.
Men are kinda necessary.
The world would be better off without men.
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
Oftentimes I debate about posting as I typically don't get much response on my posts either because they're too long, there's nothing to add or people aren't interested in the subject matter. Nonetheless, here I am again.
This post will be similar to others I've made but it asks a very important question. Are men necessary? I'm not talking about society as a whole, but in interpersonal connections. As a man, I definitely don't feel necessary most of the time. It feels sad to compare people to a term like "necessary" but it ties back to an innate need for connection, significance and value. I'm definitely not discrediting women who feel out of place or outcast with this post, but mainly just addressing a phenomenon that I've noticed.
Men and women offer different things to each other but also some of the same things. This is also different with what men offer each other and women offer each other. Men and women offer compassion, comfort, support, empathy etc to each other both in a platonic and romantic sense. Men offer each other support, encouragement, humour and distraction but largely, at least for straight men who don't seek any kind of romantic connection with other men, this is the extent. Women can offer each other affection, comfort, support, connection, empathy and refuge. Not to say that men can't offer women these things as they very much so can, but is it necessary for them to? Women can get these things on a platonic level from other women because it is their nature, to be nurturing. Men cannot get this from other men because it's not an inherent part of our nature. I think this is the biggest problem when it comes to male mental health and the consequences of it. People underestimate how much men actually need women in their lives for their nurturing nature. But since women now can provide for themselves everything that men used to provide for them back in the day, one could easily make the argument that men aren't necessary in women's lives anymore. While men like myself yearn for the affection and love that women can so comprehensively provide, I wouldn't even know how to answer for what a woman would crave from me that she couldn't find elsewhere.
Protection? Many women learn how to protect themselves through self defence courses or through intelligent planning of events.
Support? Women can rely on each other for that.
Affection? Literally the same as above, however women can also find this within their family without the need or want for a romantic partner.
Comfort? Women can provide each other with emotional or physical comfort and some even find this more normal than having it provided by a man.
Sexual intimacy? Women have always had an easier time finding a sexual partner than males if the intent is simply to sow ones oats on a one night stand. Not to mention the rise in bisexual or lesbian women. However the ever increasing popularity of sex toys in the female world continues to render men redundant as why would you bother going to the trouble of making yourself look as attractive as you can when a sex toy doesn't care what you look like?

By and large, from the outside, it feels like men just aren't necessary in the lives of women anymore and even though this is coming from my own experience, I'd wager many men would empathise or maybe even agree with the sentiments I've shared. I'd even wager some women would also understand my perspective on this matter. Women always have had something that men crave at varying levels. To be fair, some don't crave it as they've had it or they just aren't that emotive or inclined. Some men, like myself, crave affection from a woman with every fibre of their being. Yet looking at the world today, it's getting harder and harder not to feel dejected as men are always judged on what they can provide for a woman. In this culture, there's almost nothing left that we can provide that isn't superficial or that can't be acquired elsewhere. At the crux of the issue, is the FEELING like we are never measured for the quality of our character. Or at the very least, that our quality of provision is measured before our character.
I don't make this post to attack or even to criticise but to simply address a nature of this world as I observe it and ask openly what people think it means. For me, I think it means that a lot of men might find themselves retreating from women and throwing themselves into passion projects. It won't grant them the same fulfillment as seeing the joy in a woman's eyes when she feels wholeheartedly loved by the man of her dreams but it's the only other option beyond implosion or potentially ending ones existence. Sometimes men truly believe there's no point going on if love isn't going to come their way and I can definitely understand that thought process.
I think there definitely needs to be more discussions between men and women about this phenomenon as I'm not even sure how much it's thought about let alone discussed. If anyone has any thoughts, opinions or comments, please feel free to share.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Kodel · 26-30, M
@Reject I'd say it's more 50/50.
I never said that everyone would agree with every word I said but fundamentally, the question I asked in the post wasn't if people actually agreed with me. It was, "Are men necessary?" Yes I provided a lot of information supporting the side of the discussion that suggests they aren't, but that's the reason I provided one side of the discussion, to open up for the other side. I even say that my opinion is simply a phenomenon that I've noticed. I do say that many men would probably agree with the sentiments I shared because if you real them, a decent portion of them are largely true. They aren't entirely true and definitely not true of the entirety of society, but the fact that there's any truth to them is the point that I'm making.
The only way anyone would 100% agree with me, is if they were me so in that sense, you are right. However I didn't ask the question "Are men necessary" with the expectation of people saying, "No they aren't." I asked it to see what people's answers were when they said that they were necessary.
Reject · 31-35, M
@Kodel You should really learn how to be more concise with what you have to say. Brevity is your greatest asset to any discussion you’ll have with someone because we’re talking, not reading a book.

All of your delusions aside, an easy answer as to why men are necessary is because their role is to teach people how to need less. This is vital to human health. It’s often taken to extremes which is always unhealthy, but the principle couldn’t be more necessary.
Kodel · 26-30, M
@Reject Fair enough.

It might be an easy answer, however it doesn't answer the question I actually asked. Yes the base question was, "Are men necessary?" but my post provided the context of the question which is as far as romantic relationships go between men and women. Also, referring to my perspective as delusional is a bit disingenuous. I never actually said that men flat out aren't necessary in the lives of women, but simply addressed situational elements that could support a case that they aren't. I would advise making an effort to understand someone else's perspective before outright dismissing it as delusional.
Reject · 31-35, M
@Kodel Oh, goal posts have moved. Not surprised with the lengthiness of your post. Plenty of room to do that. Okay. So now it’s you questioning a woman’s desire for men in romantic relationships. Here’s the thing about that. Absolutely nothing is necessary in a romantic relationship until you feel it is because that’s kind of how love works. It’s based on what you like.

I said delusional for a few reasons I don’t care to get into because it’s not important. It’s how I see you, but that doesn’t mean I’m right. So don’t worry about my genuine impression of you even if you feel it’s disingenuous. Believe me, I came to that conclusion after attempting with effort to read through the many many words you like to write. That response was much better though.
Kodel · 26-30, M
@Reject Goalposts haven't moved but if you choose to perceive it like that, fair enough. Literally the third sentence of my actual post clarifies what I was talking about. "I'm not talking about society as a whole, but in interpersonal connections." You could make the case that I should have clarified in the actual poll so I will give you that much.
If that's how you see me fair enough. Everyone's experience is different. I'm not fussed whether or not you see me as a delusional person, but rather that you would dismiss my sentiments because you don't agree with them for whatever reason. It just feels very narrow minded.
Nonetheless, I do appreciate your thoughts no matter my stance on them. I genuinely do wish you well.
Reject · 31-35, M
@Kodel That entire response was you defending yourself just to say you’re not fussed about it. You’re not even addressing the topic anymore, preferring instead to close it off. Alright guy who isn’t fussed. Have a good one.