« Back to Album · Next »
 
Newest First | Oldest First
Dshhh · M
so, no news for you since like 1950?
Are you not in the states? it is a hyperbolic statement "hordes" even so..
ODDLY! the rights here[ says the same thing[/i] about needing to be armed in order to handle the
1) blue helmeted UN troops coming to take the guns
2) marauding bands of black people leaving the cites to invade their homes
3) those durn Mexicans the trump talked about .. and the ones that pick all the crops ?
the queers and such comming for the children

so far nothing like that has happened,, yet so many over-arm themselves against such a thing?

Only one of the right wing actions below constitutes a horde

But a lot of dead bodies
[quote]never seen, never attack anyone?[/quote]
lets not forget
the Oklahoma City bombing,( 168 dead)
Centennial Olympic Park bombing ( only one dead but over 100 wounded)
,Knoxville Unitarian Universalist church shooting,
Overland Park Jewish Community Center shooting,
2011 Tucson Shooting
, Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting
,,2014 Las Vegas shootings,
2017 Portland train attack ,
Charlottesville car attack
2018 Jeffersontown shooting,,
2019 El Paso shooting,
2020 boogaloo killings,
some would include the United States Capitol attack, 2022
Buffalo shooting[,
Pittsburgh synagogue shooting,
Louisiana black church fires,
2019 Dallas courthouse shooting

and lets not forget RED RED, that those of us of the ginger persuasion were historically considered,, less than a proper white person..
redredred · M
@redredred so should we compare body counts??
it IAs uneven, weighted towards the right

Or maybe we can discuss what can be done, or should be done?

what is your solution to mass shootings?
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
You do realize that racists don't have to blatantly say the n-word while torching minority businesses with literal torches in order to be harmful to minorities, right? Or is that too complex of a concept to penetrate that thick red hair?
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@redredred
But you don’t deny what I had to say about BLM.
You intentionally missed my point about white supremacists, and reverted to your default position of trash talking the darkies. I felt no need to fall for your distraction.
redredred · M
@LordShadowfire No. you didn’t respond because the point I made is unassailable. You haven’t the wits to counter it.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
I prefer not to argue with idiots, because they tend to deflect and distract from the main point. Racists in particular use that tactic, thinking it makes them look intelligent.

Add a comment...
 
Send Comment