This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
its implied the emperor was his apprentice wasn't it?.. in them shitty movies..
caPnAhab · 26-30, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout it was. Mentioned in Revenge of the Sith.
Were they shitty?... In some aspects yeah, but I've always liked them. They're miles better than the sequels, that's for sure
Were they shitty?... In some aspects yeah, but I've always liked them. They're miles better than the sequels, that's for sure
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
@caPnAhab just seemed like they relied on CGI more than plot
caPnAhab · 26-30, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout for the second and third movies in that trilogy, I thought the CGI was a bit overboard. Though I still think it looks good in Phantom Menace, even for today. Though, all through out, they used just as many models and miniature sets as the OG trilogy
If you care to look, I made another post about the use of practical effects throughout the prequels.
https://similarworlds.com/movies/star-wars/4803668-An-often-over-looked-aspect-of-the-Star-Wars-Prequels
If you care to look, I made another post about the use of practical effects throughout the prequels.
https://similarworlds.com/movies/star-wars/4803668-An-often-over-looked-aspect-of-the-Star-Wars-Prequels
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout its gooooodddd i like the 1st 3 aka 4 5 6 but 1 2 3 but not 4 5 6 the 1st one hahah you know what im saying