Do you agree with my analysis?

Poll - Total Votes: 20

Yes

You can only vote on one answer.

The whole world is descending into utter madness. Degeneracy is now the new normal. Sane people are hesitant to point out the obvious fearing backlash from the Politically Correct media and brainwashed masses.
Take for example the recent fiasco surrounding the X-Men movie poster where the Apocalypse was depicted choking Mystique. A miserable hag by the name of Rose McGowan who is past her prime and heydays jumped up and down in feigned fury. Feminist continue to babble about supposed 'casual violence' in the West while real oppression of women in Mid-East and ass backwards country like Pakistan was dealt with deafening silence.
If you dare to point out mass illegal immigration brings untold suffering to natives then you're a bigoted xenophobe, if you dare to point out the rate of AIDS and sexually transmitted disease among homosexuals are frighteningly higher then you're a confirmed homophobic, if you dare to point out women are weaker than men in physical strength (obviously lol!) then you're a despicable woman hater.
Orwellian doublespeak and thoughtcrime is here. Anyone daring to challenge the dominant narrative spouted by elites are quickly shutdown and routed. While gays and women are frequently treated with contempt in Islamic countries, the self styled morally superior Leftist turns a blind eye because pointing out this fact makes me an Islamophobe!!!!😌

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

@O'Connor you aren't making any sense -merely trotting out the words 'bigot' and 'hate' because I haven't just exposed the emptiness of your argument -you've exposed the emptiness of your heart.

I made it clear that I thought the Stanford rape case was appalling. You are the one that argued it meant 'we' had no right to feel any empathy for women from other cultures facing systemic and legally backed discrimination("what right have you to judge? "). Don't twist my argument so that you don't have to reflect on the absence of logic in yours.

I am criticizing human rights abuses. You're trying to argue they don't matter because they stem from cultural sources. Human rights are universal. If they could be limited to social consensus then the holocaust would be fine, slavery would be fine.

I have a very clear idea of the culture that 'idealises' women only to deny them freedom. I hear and see the other side of that 'idealisation' which is violence. It is women physically harmed to fit that purity (FGM) or punished if they fall from a male's determination of what that purity entails (denial of freedom, child marriage, honour killings, beatings by morality police for 'crimes'of clothing or behaviour). I hear Western women denigrated as 'mud surrounded by flies' or 'uncovered meat' by religious leaders. If I have no respect for the aspects of certain cultures that condone violence against women it is because they deserve none.

You're a shell of a person. All sound. No meaning. You're devoid of human compassion.

And for the record every day I stand up to people like you and battle the insidious morally bankrupt poison you peddle that violence against women is a justifiable and culturally relative thing - I am doing great things in this world.