This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
HowtoDestroyAngels · 46-50, M
@Frostcloud ain't that the truth...sadly.
Pretzel · 70-79, M
I'm guessing that proving racketeering is too complex for people to understand? maybe it needed accountants on the jury?
the prosecutor said they would ask for the max - 20 years - for the transport charge.
Now I hope every man and woman that was pressed into service sues him and he ends up broke(n)
the prosecutor said they would ask for the max - 20 years - for the transport charge.
Now I hope every man and woman that was pressed into service sues him and he ends up broke(n)
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
I heard about it on the radio. 10 years? Wtf?
he managed to grease his feet
with a oil that's clear and neat
he got away, maybe
with the oil meant for a baby.
with a oil that's clear and neat
he got away, maybe
with the oil meant for a baby.
FreestyleArt · 36-40, M
Don't worry. he haven't taste real justice yet. Diddy already went through an emulation. It's coming for him.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
bijouxbroussard · F
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
@bijouxbroussard Or perhaps the jury heard/saw evidence that the media frenzy and endless hype didn't tell the public in general and he actually was innocent of those charges? Trial by public perception is not something i feel comfortable with.
bijouxbroussard · F
@ChipmunkErnie I understand, but some of the things he admitted being involved with would definitely have been a violation of the Mann Act, which had been how we defined trafficking in times past.
Though like I said, if we’re willing to let a man who’s on the books for sexual assault remain president, the bar has dropped pretty low. And Combs is rich.
Though like I said, if we’re willing to let a man who’s on the books for sexual assault remain president, the bar has dropped pretty low. And Combs is rich.
