@bellybuttonfan17 also...you are welcome to your opinion. I just dont know if a person not well known is the answer and i dont see alot about him and maybe because he is doing a good job.
I know alot of people by face but struggle to remember names 🤣 I had forgotten about Shapiro.
I really will die on this hill: just because they are governors doesn't mean the whole base knows them and will vote for them.
I think Kamala needs a strong and well known sidekick to ensure a win. But thats my opinion.
The other two seem like good people where they are. We can't take the democrat in charge of kentucky away and leave it to the right. ..would that be a good idea?
I get what you’re saying. I’m fine with any of them. But then I’d vote for a ham sandwich over Trump or a Trumper.
People need to get over the “vote for the person not the party” myth. I’m voting against a whole philosophy that would poison the federal government and the Supreme Court even more.
@luckranger71 I will vote for wheoever they put up there. But I will express my opinion about it all too.
This should have been done before primaries. The new candidate should have had sufficient time to campaign.
I dont like that they will decide and not the voters.
I dont like that i am forced to vote for whoever and not given an opportunity to feel good about my vote meaning something aside from simply keeping fascism at bay.
@bijouxbroussard But there would be no political advantage to picking the governor of California, since that state will surely vote for her anyway, as will voters in other states whose politics align with Newsom's. I think she will pick someone viewed as a "moderate" , in order to appeal to swing voters.