The notion that vegetarianism is morally superior is groundless.

@pentacorn Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Vegetarianism's not superior ecologically or otherwise. Just advertised as such lately by The Big money behind it. Billion dollars industry is at stake 💰

@SoulKey disagree, because science

@pentacorn Lol, the thing is even science itself is bought by "big money" nowadays 💔

@Northwest Morality is not a factor when it comes to choosing a food source. At the end of the day be it an animal or a plant, all had to stop living for you to consume. And when you acknowledge that, it makes you appreciative of all those forms of life, by minimizing food waste, using inedible parts to feed livestock, or make fertilizers, and being an environmentally conscious human. I don't see anything more moral than that.

@SoulKey [quote] Morality is not a factor when it comes to choosing a food source. At the end of the day be it an animal or a plant, all had to stop living for you to consume. And when you acknowledge that, it makes you appreciative of all those forms of life, by minimizing food waste, using inedible parts to feed livestock, or make fertilizers, and being an environmentally conscious human. I don't see anything more moral than that.
[/quote]

All has nothing with your question. You asked if the notion of vegetarianism is normally superior Your argument here applies ONLY to those who eat meat.

@Unlearn No, I don't think it's achievable for anyone actually.

@SoulKey good