I agree with this. China already owns too much farmland here wtf they need to be stopped f
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Terrible reasoning here. Allow me to tell a few things and then after thinking about it perhaps you'll figure out why I'm saying so.
Physically and factually. The island of Greenland is part of North America.
Goepolitically it was claimed as property by the Kingdom of Denmark.
Kingdom. Monarchy. You may want to look up the meaning of those words and read up on the way they have historically run their governing systems.
Greenland is not so much developed as a modern country per se, and it has always been utilized very little as a population center.
Except for those that don't worry much about colder than average temps, not many have taken any interest in turning it into a good economic or area for societal growth.
Trump isn't the first one that noted that and it's been suggested by other presidents that it would be better for its population and the world if it was added to America's territories.
Especially when totalitarian governments don't generally ask, and Greenland doesn't have much so far as a defensive apparatus to hold onto its sovereignty.
And finally. I believe that it's in both America's, Denmark's, even Europe's and Greenland's best interests in these times of Chinese expansionist conducts for a deal like that to happen.
Unless you're friendly to the idea of a global CCP takeover.
So there you have it. Say what you will about him but you'd be wrong to say Trump is not highly intuitive about land.
On that issue he's the foremost world class genius that saved New York when it was on the ropes.
If you don't know that you don't know much about much.
Now that's what I call setting a table. If you have some sides. Bring em. Can't wait to hear what ya got.
Physically and factually. The island of Greenland is part of North America.
Goepolitically it was claimed as property by the Kingdom of Denmark.
Kingdom. Monarchy. You may want to look up the meaning of those words and read up on the way they have historically run their governing systems.
Greenland is not so much developed as a modern country per se, and it has always been utilized very little as a population center.
Except for those that don't worry much about colder than average temps, not many have taken any interest in turning it into a good economic or area for societal growth.
Trump isn't the first one that noted that and it's been suggested by other presidents that it would be better for its population and the world if it was added to America's territories.
Especially when totalitarian governments don't generally ask, and Greenland doesn't have much so far as a defensive apparatus to hold onto its sovereignty.
And finally. I believe that it's in both America's, Denmark's, even Europe's and Greenland's best interests in these times of Chinese expansionist conducts for a deal like that to happen.
Unless you're friendly to the idea of a global CCP takeover.
So there you have it. Say what you will about him but you'd be wrong to say Trump is not highly intuitive about land.
On that issue he's the foremost world class genius that saved New York when it was on the ropes.
If you don't know that you don't know much about much.
Now that's what I call setting a table. If you have some sides. Bring em. Can't wait to hear what ya got.