I Have a Question
So you don't believe humans evolved.
Why?
Explain your reasoning.
Why?
Explain your reasoning.
36-40, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
You have to believe the evidence as it actually stands... as it is portrayed by the laws of science, and in demonstrated form, and resist undemonstrable (or better yet, refutable) assumptions in order to come up with wishful conclusions.
The bottom line is this... Darwin was correct to the degree that life forms evolve. But the evidence doesn't show that any species ever evolved into another species (regardless of which classification level you are operating on). The evidence is only that species appear (Including us). The conclusion is obvious... especially since the transitions from one species to another, or shall we say, the record of change species to where it becomes something else, is not only not existent, but by now it appears the laws of biology and statistics, not to mention the constants of the universe don't allow it to happen.
Thus... species change... modify some characteristics, but never become something else. This evidence is not hard to find. Talk Origins won't show it because it crashes their world view, but then again, they're not that credible to begin with. If you insist on a website, True Origins regularly debunks Talk Origins. Of course... Talk Origins advocates claim that True Origins are simply deniers... or religious nuts, i.e... the ad hominem charge used when evidence weighs against you. Compare the two, and make up your own mind. Be objective.
Basically, there's no reason to treat your opening position, that humans evolved, as the starting point of current scientific understanding.
Here is just one.. but maybe among the best, links: https://www.trueorigin.org/biologymyth.php
The bottom line is this... Darwin was correct to the degree that life forms evolve. But the evidence doesn't show that any species ever evolved into another species (regardless of which classification level you are operating on). The evidence is only that species appear (Including us). The conclusion is obvious... especially since the transitions from one species to another, or shall we say, the record of change species to where it becomes something else, is not only not existent, but by now it appears the laws of biology and statistics, not to mention the constants of the universe don't allow it to happen.
Thus... species change... modify some characteristics, but never become something else. This evidence is not hard to find. Talk Origins won't show it because it crashes their world view, but then again, they're not that credible to begin with. If you insist on a website, True Origins regularly debunks Talk Origins. Of course... Talk Origins advocates claim that True Origins are simply deniers... or religious nuts, i.e... the ad hominem charge used when evidence weighs against you. Compare the two, and make up your own mind. Be objective.
Basically, there's no reason to treat your opening position, that humans evolved, as the starting point of current scientific understanding.
Here is just one.. but maybe among the best, links: https://www.trueorigin.org/biologymyth.php