I Have a Question

@UnparalleledMonster My narrative isn't false. It's what the scientific evidence, the actual scientific evidence supports. Your narrative is the false one, and it's been debunked scientifically.

I'm not opening Talk Origins. I've opened them before, and I know they give the stock answer that evolutionists provide, including arguments that have been long debunked, even by evolutionists themselves, over and over again.

The bottom line is this - if any species had ever evolved from another species, there would have been evidence found, and the transitions could be documented. We have enough capability now that we can say that if the evidence existed, we could and would have found it.

So what have we found. Similarities between species - sure, life has a similar template. But no evolutionary link. Every time evolutionists claim to provide evidence, it's easily debunked because when one follows through - they find huge gaping holes, and none of the minute transitions required. What have we found? Simply that new species exist at different times throughout history.

We have evidence that species evolve different characteristics. We don't have any example, not one, of them evolving into something else. The other damning piece of evidence is that more and more, our top scientists are finding that the micro biological processes that would require to have occurred (i.e.... the gaping hole that goes unmentioned by evolutionists hoping no one notices), don't actually occur and/or have levels of probability so outrageously hard to get to, that an amoeba would not have been created in 13.7 billion years of the universe - never mind higher forms of life.

So while others may simply say that the theory of evolution is unproven, I think it's gone past that... it's essentially debunked. You are feeding others a lie if you say otherwise, one that has easily been demonstrated.

You need to update your thinking, and stop listening to wishful thinking.