Poll - Total Votes: 13 See Poll Options
Poll - Total Votes: 13 See Poll Options
BizSuitStacy · M
What Photoshop? Guys with 36 inch dicks are pretty common.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
@BizSuitStacy
https://similarworlds.com/nature-outdoors/4518562-Picture-of-me-singing-in-the-shower
https://similarworlds.com/nature-outdoors/4518562-Picture-of-me-singing-in-the-shower
mariannezap · 31-35, F
@BizSuitStacy I know, right? And real women don't have pores!
BizSuitStacy · M
@mariannezap some of the women are more hung than the men. 😁
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
Start with McDonald’s..
The last Big Mac I got did not look like the displayed advertisement
The last Big Mac I got did not look like the displayed advertisement
Whodunnit · M
I think we have enough unnecessary laws as it is.
Dshhh · M
not laws.. not the govnerment.
we got to get better at checking ourselves
Like all the catfish i found here, just using tineye.com
soo embarrassing
we got to get better at checking ourselves
Like all the catfish i found here, just using tineye.com
soo embarrassing
Elessar · 26-30, M
Something like that is literally unenforceable. Also, would you want your tax money to go in paying people to investigate girls enlarging their boobs on Instagram, instead of, I dunno, hunting down tax evaders?
scorpiolovedeep · 51-55, M
Yes.
Technology should automatically stamp a QR code or similar on every photo you take with a unique identifier and appear as a watermark.
Technology should automatically stamp a QR code or similar on every photo you take with a unique identifier and appear as a watermark.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
[image/video - please log in to see this content]
JohnOinger · 41-45, M
@mariannezap So what do you think of Jason Momoa & Would You Do Him
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
that's a great idea at least put a disclaimer
RedBaron · M
I don’t, but maybe you do.
Pretzel · 70-79, M
I think with the possible damage of deep fakes that there will have to be some penalty
Atlotto · M
Yes.


uncalled4 · 56-60, M
I say it all the time: Caveat Emptor. Following people online looking for truth is like watching pornos for the plot.
scrood · 31-35
No - we need a law that says for every new law TWO OLD ONES must be removed PERMANENTLY - honestly if you don't know anything you see online could be FAKE you're probably a moron who deserves to be fooled