Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Am I the only one on earth, that sees the connections of Joe Bidens genderless society, to Maos' genderless society?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Yeah, because there is no "Joe Bidens genderless society," just more right-wing tripe you got suckered into echoing.
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues & schools are not teaching kids its ok not to tell your parents that kids are questioning their own sexuality? Or that the "state" has ownership of ones children according to the legaslators in California. Where do these crazy people even come from?

P.s.~ its nice to see you Elwood.
@checkoutanytime
the "state" has ownership of ones children according to the legaslators in California.
Source?
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues Eric Swalwell
@checkoutanytime Sounds like fake news to me! But maybe you have a link that can prove your claim.
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues lol, did you move under a rock, after the covid plandemic failed?

@checkoutanytime I don't see anything about "ownership" there. Remember what you said?
the "state" has ownership of ones children according to the legaslators in California.
Notification doesn't mean ownership, it means notification.
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues so you do not see how not informing parents of adolescents perseptions, prohibiting the parents from guiding their children places an unconstitutional prescient on the legal system? Where the school system has more legal influence then the parents.

@checkoutanytime I sure don't see any "ownership" there. Oh, and where in the Constitution does it specify what schools are supposed to tell parents about? Are schools mentioned at all in the Constitution? Why no, I don't think they are. What about parents - are they mentioned in the Constitution? Nope Neither parents nor children are mentioned in the Constitution. But don't take my word for it; read it yourself!

Do parents have Constitutional rights over their children? Scalia didn't think so.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told a law school audience on Monday that there is no U.S. constitutional right of parents to direct the education and upbringing of their children.

The nation’s charter document is “not a perfect Constitution,” and many “important rights are not contained there,” Scalia told an auditorium of first-year law students at Georgetown University Law Center here.

“For example, my right to raise my children the way I want,” he said. “To teach them what I want them taught, not what Big Brother says. That is not there.”

However important the rights of parents may be, according to Scalia, it is a right that must be legislatively--and not judicially--protected.
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues poorly educated teachers claiming they know a childs life long intrest pre-18 yrs of age, better than a parent does, supported by legislation is unconstitutional to say the least, on how inappropriate these people truly are, that deystroy young peoples lives with their selfcentered ideologies.

I do think you have been misguided yourself, perhaps by the university that trained you. I as a constitutionalist and biblically passionate individual, life long yearning to see the results of the wisdom freely shared in the constitution and scripture combined am disgusted by those that believe indoctrination is higher education, when the truth is tomorrow your knowledge could disappear, but my knowledge would keep humanity alive for millennium's.
@checkoutanytime Still no "ownership." BTW, did you know that teachers, principals, guidance counselors, etc are all mandated reporters? Are you familiar with the legal ramifications of being a mandated reporter?

If a teacher has reason to believe a child is being either neglected or abused, said teacher has a legal responsibility to report any such problem. To the police. By dialing 911. That's the law, and any teacher who doesn't follow it is legally liable for their failure.

Read more here: https://www.educationcorner.com/teachers-mandated-reporters.html





BTW, funny that you should mention "poorly educated teachers." Did you know teachers are fleeing Florida after your buddy Ron Santos started passing his silly laws? Yeah, Florida no longer requires a college degree to be a teacher. And the STILL can't get enough warm bodies in front of classes. Talk about poorly educated, LOL!!!

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-florida-law-education-veterans-military-degree-645106455513
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues the Amish are the least vaxed community. The Amish have 0% autistic, and are the least ill community, without your deception. o.M.G.
@checkoutanytime Nope. Plenty of Amish get vaccinated. And although autism is diagnosed less among Amish, they still have it. Amish also drink far less and use far less tobacco than the rest of the population - this healthier lifestyle explains all the heath benefits of being Amish.

In 2011, the journal Pediatrics published a survey of 1,000 randomly selected Amish parents in Ohio showing that only 14% of the responding parents completely exempted their children from vaccines[1]. Among them, 86% declared concern over adverse effects, and not religious reasons, for vaccine avoidance.

The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among the Amish population is not well-documented, but a conference paper from the International Society for Autism Research reported a reduced prevalence of 1 in 271 in Amish communities, compared to the overall U.S rate of 1 in 91 children at that time[2]. The authors pointed out, however, that the observation may represent either a true lower ASD rate or a potential bias in the diagnosis.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/claim-that-the-amish-are-healthier-because-they-opt-out-of-all-vaccines-is-incorrect/
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues false! The Amish are against vax, bc of their beliefs in nature, and by far are the healthiest community going.
@checkoutanytime Do you live among the Amish? No. But you think you know more than the people who research the topic among the Amish. I gave you my source; what's your source??
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues no, but I do not live amongst the sci-fi beliefs of higher educated are of those that mislead people for gains, unlike you Elwood.
@checkoutanytime So, no source then? You just "know" about the Amish but you can't explain how? RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues I did, your ignorance of the constitution shows your disregard of the constitution and/or scripture. You truly are a eugenics proprietor weather you embrace that fact or not.
@checkoutanytime Nope, you gave no links to support your claims about the Amish, so clearly you can't support your claims.

And your claims about the Constitution are demonstrably false. Neither schools nor parents nor children are mentioned in the Constitution.

And nothing in the Constitution prevents the law from making teachers mandated reporters. Because home is the most common place for children to be injured. And the family remains the most common source of violence in the early years of a child's life. The law recognizes these problems and has made teachers mandated reporters. Because parents don't "own" children either.
checkoutanytime · 41-45, M
@ElwoodBlues I proved beyond a reasonable doubt federal school unions are misleading children, why you think I haven't is no longer my obligation. I have directed the constitution and scripture that together are the recipe, and you choose to ignore that truth, that is prominent in the multiple news articles I shared in regard to my simple truth that I shared.
@checkoutanytime You provided zero links and proved nothing. Have a nice day.