Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Jill Biden awarded a man for

National Women’s Day!

Read it here!
https://www.foxnews.com/media/twitter-laughs-groans-jill-biden-gives-biological-male-women-courage-award-game-ladies
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
Dr. Jill has an EdD

Doctor of Education. Getting one of those is like getting a driver's license
@HoraceGreenley Classic republican hatred of educations. SAD!!
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues Nope. I just don't like the Biden family.

And the Left destroyed education. That's what's really sad.
@HoraceGreenley [quote]And the Left destroyed education.[/quote]
That's why we're having so many medical breakthroughs and improved microelectronics and amazing AI - because "the Left destroyed education." [i]RIIIIIIIGHT[/i]

We both know that your problem with education is that more educated people tend to disagree with your right-wing bromides. We're at the point where the majority of right-wingers think college is bad for America.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues The Left took its eye off the ball. Students need to read, write, do math and science. .

Gender studies are irrelevant
@HoraceGreenley I started looking up stuff about gender studies. Seems about 10,000 people graduate per year with that major out of about 2 million bachelor's degrees per year. Then I looked up who offers the degree on US News & World Report college rankings.

[quote]Here are the best colleges with a Gender Studies Major · Princeton University · Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Harvard University · Stanford University · Yale University · University of Chicago · University of Pennsylvania Duke University [/quote]

This got me wondering. Do you know the requirements for a gender studies degree? I sure don't. I also sure don't think I know more about how to educate people than the folks who run those schools.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues The point is it's a waste of time
@HoraceGreenley If you don't like it, don't major in it. But don't turn all fascist and try to tell everybody else what to do!
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues I'd never do that. However, i don't believe this field of study produces anything useful.

I have that right to criticize this field just like people can study it.
@HoraceGreenley [quote]And the Left destroyed education.[/quote] And your example of the destruction of education is the fact that about 0.5% of bachelor's degrees are in a field neither you don't understand.

I'd say that if you're equating the existence of gender studies with the destruction of education, you're indirectly trying to tell people not to study it.
specman · 51-55, M
@HoraceGreenley Yes I would believe it. Our education program especially where they are pushing the far leftist agenda is really bad. They might do studies and stuff but they’re probably not true. He’ll look how the left’s tried to cover up the false information they were producing about Covid. The kicker of it there’s probably still people that believe some of studies on different things. By producing the fake studies they are doing a little of both covering up or to further their agenda on. Their really anti American 🇺🇸.
@specman Oh, now I understand! From your perspective, it's REALITY that has a left wing bias, [b]LOL!!![/b]

[quote]ook how the left’s tried to cover up the false information they were producing about Covid.[/quote] What false information, pray tell??
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues "Biden said, ‘If you get vaccinated, you won’t get COVID."
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues That the virus actually came from the Wuhan lab.
@HoraceGreenley Two agencies say, with "low confidence," that a lab leak may have been the source; four other agencies say, also with "low confidence," that it was the wet market.

DUUUDE!!! you're so skeptical about climate change, even with a 97% consensus. And you're so credulous about the lab leak, even with only a 33% consensus and "low confidence," LOL!!!

BTW, Biden is telling them all to keep digging. He's not burying it or trying to "move on."
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Yeah, we know, bats, right?
@sunsporter1649 No dude. We don't know. Nobody knows. that's the point, idiot!!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Those aliens in Area 51 perhaps?
@sunsporter1649 You're having problems with reading comprehension, I see. Try reading it again:

Two agencies say, with "low confidence," that a lab leak may have been the source; four other agencies say, also with "low confidence," that it was the wet market.

Maybe you need to see it in a larger font:

[big][b]Two agencies say, with "low confidence," that a lab leak may have been the source; four other agencies say, also with "low confidence," that it was the wet market. [/b][/big]

See? We don't know. Nobody knows. that's the point, idiot!!!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Orson Wells' Martians?
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues You believe this nonsense? Other agencies are promoting the lab release.

The biology supports the lab release.

Why are you protecting the Chinese?
@HoraceGreenley DUUUDE!!! The point is it's still very much an open question!!

Only a fool would commit to either possibility when it's all "low confidence." You're so credulous about the lab leak, even with only a 33% consensus and "low confidence," LOL!!!
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues The science doesn't support this position. It indicates a lab release is the only explanation.

The Biden administration has been covering this up. But now some agencies are promoting a high probability of a lab release.

I have the following questions:
1. How come you are unaware that the Biden administration is changing their position to support a lab release?
2. How are you unaware of the scientists involved in promoting the lie of a naturally occurring phenomenon?
3. Why aren't you aware of the scientific evidence supporting the lab release?
4. Why are you supporting China?

Who do you work for and why are you promoting a lie?
@HoraceGreenley [quote]The science doesn't support this position[/quote] The SCIENCE doesn't support either position enough - that's what "low confidence" means.

However, your GiAnTt CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiEs support whatever you want them to support.

[quote]1. How come you are unaware that the Biden administration is changing their position to support a lab release?[/quote]

As I said earlier, two US gov't agencies say, with "low confidence," that a lab leak may have been the source; four other agencies say, also with "low confidence," that it was the wet market. Only a fool would commit to either possibility when it's all "low confidence."

All the rest of your questions only pertain to your GiAnTt CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiEs. Sorry but I can't indulge you there.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@ElwoodBlues Answer my questions