In the USA yes, but the rail unions here in the UK have announced further one- or two- day actions, postponed until a respectable time after the late Queen's funeral.
Ours is over pay, mainly. I am not sure if it also involves other matters such as working practices worrying the staff about redundancies.
What is not made clear in Britain is that our dispute is with far fewer companies than the liveries and badges suggest. Two examples:
- Many of the "companies" are just badges used by the First Group, based in Edinburgh, (shares around £100... each.) This company also owned Greyhound Buses, in America, for a time. Makes a change, ownership that way round.
- 'Cross-Country Trains' (passenger, SW England to Scotland via the Midlands and NE of England), much of the rail goods transport, and licensing the steam-hauled heritage specials on the Network Rail lines: Deutsche-Bahn, the German state-owned railway company.
Network Rail staff are also involved. This is the state-owned, owner of the railway lines, stations, signalling and civil-engineering.
Are there parallels with the American situation?
What did surprise me, when I read a report another SW user referred me to, is that the US dispute included a demand, now met I understand, for paid sick and medical-appointment leave! Surprising to me, in a country where that's been pretty well standard for many years though I think long-term sick-pay can be reduced after some months.