@jackjjackson how is the Durham investigation going for you guys? Remember this was supposed to equate to trump and his Republican lackeys attempt to overthrow the election. Well so far after what 3/4 million you did get one guy suspended from work for a month.
At what point will it be as embarrassing as the AZ cyber ninja fiasco?
Durham’s investigation’s goal is whatever is best for the United States. The first trial was Re will be more. Your constantly trying to create a false equivalency doesn’t help our country. It merely tries to obfuscate extremely dangerous unconstitutional behavior. The actors in thw January y action are being prosecuted by a democrat Justice Department and those violating the law will be punished max they should be.
How do you explain away the now proven fact that the whole 2016 Russia conspiracy “crisis” was STARTED by Mrs Clinton with the goal of cheating her way into the White House. Sure Trump has behaved and continues to behave like a jackass but the two are separate and apart distinct things. Please do your best to attempt to explain away Mrs Clinton’s actions WITHOUT mentioning Trump.
@jackjjackson well finding Mrs Clinton role in starting the Russian investigation is Durham’s job. And I repeat after millions spent he has got one guy suspended for one month. Call us back when he proves the right’s allegations.
Dude you were one pushing the “false equivalence” that somehow Clinton equaled the January 6th insurrection, again one 30 day suspension for violating department protocols. 🤷♂️
And you suddenly are interested in the good of the country when during the election you gloried in Trump’s claim of fraud being necessary to defeat him, you his dozens of groundless suits. Etc. Remember during the Ukraine investigation when anyone who put the interest of country over Trump’s was a “deep state” operative? You are interested ONLY in starting partisan political food fights, noting more.
Monte, with all due respect you’re a broken record. You created the term “false equivalency test”. I’ve consistently expressed my disgust regarding Trump’s behavior. You put your stamp of approval on every liberal talking point. The MSM rightly believes that folks like you will simply parrot their conclusionsand not care about facts or reality.
Here is it from a source you trust:
[quote]CNN)Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign's plans in fall 2016 to share information with a reporter about an uncorroborated alleged server backchannel between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank, her former campaign manager testified Friday in federal court.[/quote]
You NEVER acknowledge reality. Let’s try and see is you can directly answer this one:
Is CNN’s statement true or not true? Yes or no. No “false equivalency” diatribes or Trump did so and so and such and such a date. Simply agree or disagree with one of your trusted sources. You’re so busy “being the smartest person in the room” that you fail to realize you contribute nothing factually and insist on living in the past.
I really do think you can be part of the solution and not part of the problem in the]is country. It’s just that you’re “stuck”. You can move forward. I know you can.
@jackjjackson one I didn’t coin the term “ false equivalence “. I wish I had because it perfectly expresses someone who compares Jan 6th with a thirty day work suspension. “You have consistently expressed disgust at trump and his behavior”. Seriously?? Somewhere after January 6th you have moved to a “nothing to see here, trump is gone and nothing important happened, he is no worse than anyone else”. The idiocy of 5hat statement lead to my false equivalency statement. Here you are simply lying. I hate to be hatch but yeah…
@jackjjackson When have I parroted liberal talking points? And incidentally the last reports I red five minutes ago the Clinton campaign did NOT approve Sussman going to the FBI. 🤷♂️ And think for a minute the absurdity of asserting that this equates with the violence of January 6th. Not to mention the detailed effort to tell and convince, his followers that he could only lose through fraud and claiming fraud without any proof. And is still dong so still without evidence.
@jackjjackson well YOUR point was that it was impossible to separate trump from the terrible deeds t(at got one guy suspended for a month, so yeah you sort of opened up t(e floodgates. 🤷♂️
