Anxious
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I just read that Biden said something that made it seem like the U.S will hold Russia accountable. Geeze. Is he going to bring us into all this too?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
What he should do and what he is actually doing are two different things.

This is a NATO problem and like it or not we are apart of NATO.

Now having said that. NATO isn't getting involved either with troops!

NATO needs to get off it's collective rear ends! Sanctions are not going to work with anyone that isn't already in the sanctions game.

Economically Russia is independent of the world. They are not even a member of the IMF like China is.
@DeWayfarer NATO is the US foreign legion. It takes orders from Washington and exists to implement American control of Europe and antagonize Russia.

The US attempt to force NATO on Russia's border started this whole mess.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow have to disagree here. Mostly because many members don't even want sanctions.

No sanctions definitely no troops!

It's NATO's inaction with Crimea as well as Russia's actions that started this!
@DeWayfarer That actually proves my point. It is not about what the members want, it is about what Washington decides.

And this is not really just my opinion. I basically paraphrased the words of the very first NATO Secretary General on why it exists at all.

This has been it's purpose literally since it's founding.

That is also why we are seeing the fates of Europe being negotiated in Washington, not in European capitals.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow no it doesn't. Because NATO is not sending troops now nor did they do absolutely anything not even sanctions with Crimea.

I will keep on saying this is a NATO problem not a US problem. Because we are only members. They collectively have voted over the US before.

The darn pipeline is one of the things!
@DeWayfarer As for Crimea that is the direct result of NATO. With the US coup in Kiev in 2014 and attempting to seize the largest Russia base in the area. The same would have happened if Russia backed Hawaiian separatists and tried to seize Pearl Harbour.
@DeWayfarer Again, pretending NATO and the US are separate is a total fiction that doesn't hold with reality or even it's stated reason for existing.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow now you're making no sense what so ever.

No compassion for fictional situations.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow yep! fiction! Pipeline exist in part at least.
@DeWayfarer I am sorry you don't understand the entire point of why NATO exists or how it operates. And I am not talking about on paper.

No idea what your random tangent on pipelines is about.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I bring it up because of your "fictional" case! There's no comparison!
@DeWayfarer Again, I am sorry you think the facts about why NATO even exists is fiction. Even the first Secretary General of NATO disagrees with your opinion.

It exists to maintain American control of Europe, antagonize Russia, and limit European independence.

It also exists to manufacture the appearance of international support for American military adventures.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow and who do you think that pipeline is for! 🤣

Who guards it? 🤷‍♂️

It sure isn't the US!
@DeWayfarer What are you even talking about. NATO and some unnamed pipeline have nothing to do with each other.

You seem really desperate to create a pretense to deny the stated founding principles for why NATO was even created.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow no you are doing exactly as you are accusing me of!

You're the one that replied to me! Not me to you!

DON'T AGREE, DON'T REPLY!
@DeWayfarer I am simply stating facts that don't fit your position. Pretending NATO and the US are separate doesn't change the nature of the group or it's purpose.


These are simply facts that go back to the founding since 1949.

Not sure what you are on about with pipelines.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow YOUR FACTS are not facts though.

Your doing the very same thing you accused another huge poster of doing!

You're becoming him!

Don't agree, don't reply!
@DeWayfarer [quote]YOUR FACTS are not facts though. [/quote]


Sorry but your beliefs don't change the facts. You claim it is not factual but offer zero evidence to support that.

I literally paraphrased the founding Secretary General of NATO as to why it was even created. I am sorry if that is inconvenient.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow Hint!


[big]STAY OFF MY REPLIES TO OTHERS![/big]

You are doing the same thing as "know it all" Mark!
@DeWayfarer Again, no i am not. I am stating facts that apparently upset you for some reason.

Mark pulls stuff out of his ass. Everything I have said is backed with facts and about 80 years of history.

I am sorry if that doesn't fit the current narrative.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow your just like him though!

And the longer this continues the more you are proving it!

This my reply to the OP. NOT YOU!
@DeWayfarer No I am not. You are desperately trying to pretend otherwise.


I am sorry you can't handle facts that don't fit your opinion. Do some research.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow

Commercial break...

keep on taking...

Yes, keep on talking ...

Hush! Baby sleeping! Bye!