Elon Musk's accomplishments in full

@BigGuy2 But no ACTUAL proof to support his findings.

@BigGuy2 Eventually he will actually have to account for his "achievements", rather than posting claim after unsubstantiated claim on social media.

@SunshineGirl Yes we're way ahead of you on this. After we reduce spending by the first trillion there will be a top Doge 10 or 25 or 50, deeply moving award presentation done by a selected telly channel for all the best most efficient achievements in year one. Then, of number 47s important branches, acknowledgements forthcoming as they offer suggestions for further work for the COE. (CHAINSAWS OF EFFICIENCY) and better ways to accomplish their jobs. With honorarium of a symbolic title designation at least.

Be there or be square!

@SteelHands Reducing spending . . or government efficiency . .

Decide which it is. The two are mutually incompatible.

@BigGuy2
Prove it. His claims are ENTIRELY unsubstantiated.

@SunshineGirl Your claim that reduced spending and increased efficiency are incompatible is by no means a consistent correlation and by every measure logically historically and physically actually the opposite has always been the sound principle.

A rocket booster a third as powerful twice as inflationary adjusted cost was once a mostly spent, entirely unreusable item compared to a self landing one.

The work of an entire bldg wing several floors of accountants, record clerks, copy machines, file cabinets and bookkeepers can now be maintained by 3 people and a computer with a printer and backup file system.

A literal library filled with maps and climate controlled systems, curators and janitors on 2 shifts can now be automatically loaded into millions of planes trains and automobiles with satellite navigation as a boost, on a computer chip the side of baby's fingernail.

You're talking silly.

@SteelHands Government is not a rocket booster, accountancy business, or office. It provides statutory and essential services that the private sector will not touch. These are not always cheap to administer, nor can they be made cheaper (which is why the private sector shows no interest in them).

If you cut tax inspectors and IT investment from an already creaking and antiquated IRS, less revenue is collected and government becomes less efficient. Simple as.

@SunshineGirl To begin with you lack understanding of the best reason to have a government rather than contract our interstate highways to a pavement company or hire mercenaries and pirates to keep our country secure we do both very well, thank you. That part , two thirds of the budget gets looked at hard every quarter. It's that overgrown 1/3 that was really only optional to begin with and the more important parts, perhaps as much as 50% of that 1/3 are now being made inefficient by deplorable excess, waste, stupidity, bad theories and outright being absconded with.

You're not citing specifics so I won't.

You're just plain wrong and believing government parasites at best, croney thieves at the worst. Unless you're one of them. So should stop crying over what you don't really understand that many of us around far longer than you understand very well.

We're done paying a million dollars a second for a toilet that doesn't work.

@SteelHands So you want spending to be reduced because you disagree with areas of the democratically sanctioned budget. That is a legitimate point of view, but it is an entirely different thing to efficiency. Simply opting not to provide a service is a spending cut, it does nothing to make government more efficient.

@SunshineGirl Semantics arguments like yours are for people that push doggie scat while giving it the name nutritious daily requirement.

Those "government sanctioned" expenditures aren't government business by any valid pretext.

Therfore, like a boat anchor on a rocket ship that takes up unnecessary space, slows down the rocket, consumes precious fuel, adds dangerous complexity to the primary mission, either in a cosmic or a material sense, that's the very definition of waste, stupidity and inefficiency.

We use DOGE because DOSE already has several uses

@SunshineGirl oh really

List after list is produced in the Whitehouse Briefings, but you're NOT interested in anything being proven, because when facts are provided, you's brainwashed nutjobs do the usual, you scream:

"Fake Facts"

... the simple fact that they're protesting about DOGE, shows that they're not protesting about DOGE per se, it's that they're Slush Fund is being found out, the more they protest, the bigger the scandal/corruption will be eventually found

... it's akin someone saying to me:

"You're a Conspiracy Theorist"

Now, my reply is:

"I'm get'n close to the truth am i, that's why you're calling me a Conspiracy Theorist"

I believe Senator Kennedy stated:

37-0 in Conpsiracy Theorists being proven right

@SW-User ... tut tut

You only have to see the level of protests to show the corrupt LibTURD's are being found out ... the bigger the protests, the bigger the corruption

@BigGuy2 you don’t think the protests are because the federal government is being systematically dismantled so that it can be brought under the direct control of Musk? No, didn’t think so

@SW-User ... tut tut:

... who promised the EXACT same thing what Trump is ACTUALLY doing, was it:

A The guy who lied on having an affair with Monica ... Clinton ...AND the other guy, whose wife's a bloke ... Obama

or

B The guy who lied on having an affair with Monica ... Clinton ...AND the other guy, whose wife's a bloke ... Obama

or

C The guy who lied on having an affair with Monica ... Clinton ...AND the other guy, whose wife's a bloke ... Obama

@BigGuy2 Yup. They don't only pay bad actors to clown the opposition, put honest people in a bad light. Most of the lefts work is all right out of the salinskivitian (pls excuse the camo) conspiracy manual. Their teeny influence now is shrinking by the day. If they don't get smart soon one of their own is gonna put em to bed. The more they cause trouble the harder we need to grind down on em.

Regarding those who scoff at God. I'm recalling a statement that Those who have nothing are gonna lose even that which threy think they have.

Sounds about right.

@SteelHands so true and so well said

@BigGuy2 Yup.