This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
EH???
Looking at the article, it applies to anyone who gives a minor (presumably male or female) a haircut or allows it to cross-dress, in ways the State's politicians dislike.
So really, it means a girl who has short hair (how short?) is herself breaking that State's law? Or wears jeans instead of skirts? Jeans, remember, were invented originally as men's work trousers.
What would happen if an Arkansas resident has her hair cut in some other state, or even abroad? Or has her hair cut not by a professional stylist but by a friend or relative? And crucially by her own wish, not under coercion I could understand if that was the point of the Bill.
Looking at the article, it applies to anyone who gives a minor (presumably male or female) a haircut or allows it to cross-dress, in ways the State's politicians dislike.
So really, it means a girl who has short hair (how short?) is herself breaking that State's law? Or wears jeans instead of skirts? Jeans, remember, were invented originally as men's work trousers.
What would happen if an Arkansas resident has her hair cut in some other state, or even abroad? Or has her hair cut not by a professional stylist but by a friend or relative? And crucially by her own wish, not under coercion I could understand if that was the point of the Bill.