I find it endlessly amusing when fascist supporters make unsupported claims, then attempt to support their claims with name calling and insults.

One wonders, is that the sort of persuasive argument that works on them? Were I to refer to them as "MAGATS" or some such, would it cause them to respond positively and change their opinions? Are they treating me the way they wish to be treated?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Why would anyone want to when you yourself start out unprovoked with just that?

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@jackjjackson I am hardly "starting out unprovoked," my little MAGAT.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

When one begins a new thread one is not responding nor provoked. More name calling I see. No one with a brain disagrees with the concept of making America great.

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@jackjjackson I was responding to previous responses by one @Dino11 in a previous thread. However, it is plain to see that logic and reason are lost on you.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

You should have responded to Dino. You’ve proved me correct yet again CB. @CorvusBlackthorne

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@jackjjackson I did respond to him, repeatedly. Then, after a responding to him failed to evoke a logical, reasonable response, I posted this.

It proves nothing except the fact that you lot always stick together, even when it is completely irrational to do so.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Lot? I know no Nino much less the thread to which you refer. Are you frustrated from losing the debate you started or were you blocked? @CorvusBlackthorne

CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M

@jackjjackson His name is @Dino11, as I say, and there was no debate. He began repeating himself like a mindless bot or blind Trump cultist, and I was expressing amusement in this thread when you came along and chose to attack.