What law is Donald Trump breaking? Where is it in statute?

8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien is an actual U.S. law that everyone who has entered the country illegally has broken.

What law is Trump breaking by deporting them? Inquiring minds want to know.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325&ved=2ahUKEwishpn8kK6QAxVBcDwKHS9qDoQQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0m55WMq4k64f_QC9vi68YM

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

BorealPedant · 41-45, M

Lol do you actually care if anyone answers who isn't just applauding for you?

justbob · 61-69, M

@BorealPedant Actually, if there is a real citation I would be interested in reading it to see if I agree with the interpretation. An actual title and section like title 8 section 1325

BorealPedant · 41-45, M

@justbob You talking Donald Trump personally or ICE as an agency or individual ICE agents?

justbob · 61-69, M

@BorealPedant President Trump

BorealPedant · 41-45, M

@justbob From Case No. 25-cv-05893-NW.

The law Trump is breaking here is the due process clause (amendment 5). His ordered policy that ICE agents can detain and deport people awaiting their hearings is obviously illegal. Notably in this case the person at issue and the court were repeatedly lied to by ICE who claimed they wanted to just interview him and instead just detained him for deportation. There are a LOT of cases like these since it gives ICE easy quotas by prioritizing undocs who comply with the law.

The Due Process Clause prohibits the Government from depriving individuals of their
liberty without due process of law. U.S. Const. amend. V. “Freedom from imprisonment—from
government custody, detention, or other forms of physical restraint—lies at the heart of the liberty that Clause protects.” Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001). This liberty interest applies to people who are not citizens — people who are at times referred to as “aliens” in statutes, regulations, and caselaw. Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976, 990 (9th Cir. 2017) (Due Process Clause “protections appl[y] ‘to all “persons” within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent,’ and to immigration detention as well as criminal detention.”) (quoting Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 693 (referring to noncitizens as
“aliens”))

gregloa · 61-69, M

@BorealPedant
Oh ok expert. Were you there? Did you witness any arrests? Illegals have no constitutional rights. Ice are federal agents. They are doing their job. If an individual resists or fails to produce legal documents or id then ice agents have no choice but to detain them for further investigation. That is due process. Anyone that tries to interfere is obstructing justice. Your statement is a flat lie and the sad part is you believe it.

BorealPedant · 41-45, M

@gregloa I literally pasted information from a court of law that says they have constitutional right to due process.

The fifth amendment says no PERSON not no CITIZEN.

It's your constitution if you don't like it maybe the people in charge should change it and write some laws or something.

gregloa · 61-69, M

@BorealPedant 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂please stop. 🤣😂🤣😂 can’t stand it anymore. 🤣😂🤣😂