Why doesn't Trump send troops to S.C. to turn on the spigot?
It worked so well on the L.A. wildfires.
80-89, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Must have since the liberals aren't talking about it
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@MasterLee If you're talking about his claims of sending military to turn on the spigot in California, they are laughing too hard to talk.
1. The little amount of water released from the dams was normal given the level of water with an atmospheric river storm coming in;
2. The water was all from Northern California, not from the Northwest;
3. The water didn't flow to L.A. because the canal system doesn't reach there: it flowed into the Central Valley for farm usage or into the Delta for the fisheries;
4. No Federal troops were involved. No spigot, no Federal troops, and no connection to L.A. or its water issues during the fires. Perhaps he'll find the connection in South Carolina.
1. The little amount of water released from the dams was normal given the level of water with an atmospheric river storm coming in;
2. The water was all from Northern California, not from the Northwest;
3. The water didn't flow to L.A. because the canal system doesn't reach there: it flowed into the Central Valley for farm usage or into the Delta for the fisheries;
4. No Federal troops were involved. No spigot, no Federal troops, and no connection to L.A. or its water issues during the fires. Perhaps he'll find the connection in South Carolina.