Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can 230 doctors, nurses and health care professionals be wrong?

More than 230 doctors, nurses and health care professionals are calling on former President Donald Trump to release his medical records, arguing that he should be transparent about his health "given his advancing age."
"Trump is falling concernedly short of any standard of fitness for office and displaying alarming characteristics of declining acuity," the 238 signatories wrote in a letter dated Oct. 13 and first obtained by CBS News. "In the limited opportunities we can examine his behavior, he's providing a deeply concerning snapshot." Cheers!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
230 people could be wrong, and realistically, and as much as I appreciate the effort, we're just likely to have Trump dictate a letter, as he did with Bornstein, or get a statement from "Dr. Candyman," aka Ronny Jackson.
In fairness the GOP has been saying that Biden has been unfit for years. @MistyCee
@jackjjackson I'm not sure what that has to do with anything, tbh.
Did anyone ever including now get a straight answer regarding Biden? @MistyCee
@jackjjackson Ah. He dropped out of the race, I guess. I guess, if Trump were to do that, we could draw a parallel. That'd be ok with me.
Indeed he did. However since he is still in the WH [i]someone seems to have determined he is mentally fit to be there? @MistyCee
@jackjjackson Or they didn't. Are we really back to two wrongs make a right, or if one guy commits a crime it's peachy for another to do it?

Actually the point you're making kind of helps what I was saying. Trying to get Trump to release medical records is really not going to help anyone much. He'll never agree to release anything damaging and wouldn't hesitate to release false information if it did.

At best, it's a little chip, like him refusing to debate. They might all add up, but it's not worth losing sleep over anyone.
That sounds a little desperate. I’ve been thinking about the anti Trump narrative. The dems say when Trump lost in 2020 he attempted to overturn the Constitution and take over in a coup. Or it could have been he and his advisors were not happy with the vote counting. The dems have gotten everyone riled up that it will happen again. That’s actually impossible because IF he wins he can’t run for reelection. The scenario never occurs. The more extreme dems claim if elected he’ll try to install himself as dictator. As close as Congress is regardless who ends of with the majority of what no way does legislation pass supporting that. Supreme Court? The chief sides with the dems and guaranteed based on their voting to dat so will Kavanaugh Barrett or both. The dems election pitch is based on pure Alice in Wonderland nonsense. Meanwhile BO is incited voting racist voting. Baffling. @MistyCee
@jackjjackson An awful lot of that post is about Trump not being able to do what he says he'll do.

Both sidesing the Alice in Wonderland is I'm sure tempting, but you barely tried.

It seems like it should be easier to go after liberals for believing in fairy tales.
I wanted to focus factually on those two particular fallacies. No need for an all out attack on Harris. Her issues are well known and no need to repeat. Once again it seems the dems are likely to lose to a candidate they should easily beat because they picked the absolute worst candidate or close to it. I e said all along that with Josh Shapiro at the top of the tickets the dems would have cruised to thr WH in 2024. @MistyCee
RockerDad · M
@jackjjackson that’s because that’s exactly what happened. We all saw it, left and right alike.
You were TOLD a narrative. @RockerDad
RockerDad · M
@jackjjackson so don’t trust your eyes and ears?
You smell bad



@RockerDad
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@jackjjackson I kind of like Shapiro, but I really doubt he'd cruise against Trump. I do expect him to pop up again, assuming of course, Democrats can vote in the future.
He’ll be running against Vance in 2028. The Constitution will remain in place. A huge concern is if the dems win SCOTUS packing. @MistyCee
RockerDad · M
@jackjjackson Trump would never have enough of a congressional presence to actually change the constitution, even if he has both houses of congress. I can almost guarantee he will not get a single democratic vote on much of anything. None of us are going to fall in line behind him, I know I certainly won’t. That said, I have no doubt that Trump will try to do all kinds of dastardly things from day one.
[media=https://youtu.be/uKcAoTGF_tU]

@RockerDad