Donald Trump wants to set up a fourth reich

@MethDozer Have they even banned the books on "Critical Brain Theory." 🤦🏻

@Burnley123 [image deleted][image deleted]

@MethDozer He said "read a book". OK, there ya go. What is funny?

@Auggie I'll tell you what's funny. You haven't read that book! You just googled it and posted the cover.

How do I know?

Because I looked it up and it's a dystopian science fiction novel with an [i][b]ironic[/b][/i] title.

😆🤦🏻😭🤪

@Burnley123 You said read a book. Are you now saying books lie? Are you now saying books are not reliable sources? 🤣😂

@Auggie I'm saying that: not only haven't you read this book, that you haven't even read the synopsis.

The book isn't a historical analysis of Hitler's "liberal" politics (😆) it's a dystopian science fiction novel with a liberal British author who called it "The liberal politics of Adolf Hitler," as an ironic title .

This is an [b]epic[/b] self-own. 😜

@Burnley123 So you ARE now saying books lie. You ARE now saying books are not reliable sources.
So dont tell people to "read a book".

@Auggie No, I'm saying you are lying about having read a source and you are clueless about what the book you claim to have read is even about!.

@Burnley123 You said to read a book. Now books are no good. [b][big]LMAO!!![/big][/b]

@Auggie You haven't read that book. I know that, you know that and so does anyone reading this exchange.

The book has an [i]ironic[/i] title because the author is so clearly not buying your premise that he used it to take the piss.

Your source (that you haven't read) is on the opposite side to the argument you are making to the point that it literally parodies the idea that Hitler was a liberal in it's title!

@Burnley123 Yes I did. I read both books. Did you see TWO books? And there are more.
You said to read a book. Now books are no good. [b][big]LMAO!!![/big][/b]

@Burnley123 Ah you tried, you really did. I'm dying over here. Using a fictional book as a historical reference.

@SatanBurger He said read a book. He did not specify. Now "a book" is no good. 😂

@Auggie [quote]Nazism is a form of fascism,[5][6][7][8] with [b]disdain for liberal democracy [/b]and the parliamentary system. It incorporates a dictatorship,[4] fervent antisemitism, anti-communism, anti-Slavism,[9] scientific racism, white supremacy, Nordicism, social Darwinism and the use of eugenics into its creed. Its extreme nationalism originated in pan-Germanism and the ethno-nationalist Völkisch movement which had been a prominent aspect of German ultranationalism since the late 19th century. Nazism was strongly influenced by the Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged after Germany's defeat in World War I, from which came the party's underlying "cult of violence".[10] It subscribed to pseudo-scientific theories of a racial hierarchy,[11] identifying ethnic Germans as part of what the Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race[/quote]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

@SatanBurger That is not a book. It is wikipedia which anybody can edit at any time, including YOU. 🤣
Is a fictional book a "book"? Yes or no?

@Auggie okay, fair enough.Try reading beyond some McCarthy lacky conspiracist and some nobody.



You can't just change a wikipedia page on the fly you nitwit.

Hitler was not a liberalband had a disdain for liberalism. Anyone who says otherwise has no clue what liberalism actual is historically or what Nazism was.

@Auggie I already said fair enough.