This was two years ago when Charlie Kirk was still alive but I found this relevant

@Kwek00 I think that if churches and organizations like turning point are going to be activist organizations then they need to pay their dues. The church has stuck their noses into everything and they sitting there leeching off the community

@missyann Yesterday I watched a girl ask him a question: "Are you concerned about the democratic process?".

And like the autist he is, he does the: "I don't have a dog, I have a Labrador" rant. Which is something a lot of republicans suffer from. The USA, the last time that I looked, has a presedential and representative liberal democratic system. That's a lot of words, saying that it's a republic but also a form of democracy. No one in the US that talks about their system as a democracy, talks about a "direct democracy", which is also a form of democracy. At the end of the of the video, he never answered the girls question... which isn't that strange, when you are not only trying to poison the well but are also trying to say that you are perfectly fine with minority rule, because there is no majority in the US for christian nationalism. That's exactly why those christian nationalists, are trying to do everything they can to exclude OR diminish the vote of citizens that don't vote for their project. But the "it's a republic", is a red herring. Not to mention... that in todays constellation, the idea of being a "republic" is laughable with the currect administration and congres. Something Charlie had no real issues with, and even cheered on the current affairs.

Yeah well, radicals are ussually really adamant about the messages they deliver. That's pretty much part of the definition. Being "adamant", isn't nescesarily a virtue. You can be unshakable in believes that are unfounded, bad and/or produce negative outcomes.

EDIT:

Also, someone that is "adamant", and is concious of that... shouldn't use the "prove me wrong" slogan. People that are dogmatic, will never accept that they are wrong. That's why Charlie didn't engage in discussion, he did debate. He was unable to really learn anything about the toppics, he only learned how to articulate his dogmatic believes in a better way. That's why Charlie is a charlatan, a snake oil peddler, that presented himself as honest broker. He didn't seek knowledge, he didn't sharpen his views, he just imposed his ideas on others.

@missyann What @Kwek00 said.

@missyann And pretty soon it will be the "Peoples Democratic Republic of Trumpistan".. But please. Continue to argue that a nation cant be a Democracy and a Republic, depending on the electoral process, while the ship continues to sink..😷

@SatanBurger So you're not going to answer my question, ok fine. Typical

@ron122 Ice wasn't the main subject of the post, stop taking it off subject on purpose to turn it away from the original point