No - in short!
You don't define "new age technology" anyway. The third word itself, coined about a hundred years ago, is so wooly it has never really meant anything anyway - and I do not denote people as "Generation Some-Letter".
Forecasts of what technical developments "will" bring have always been wide of the mark especially when pessimistic.
Human generations overlap although there is now a slow drift to a higher proportion of the elderly (including me!) in the population at large. People have always taken advantage of the Very Latest technical developments - alongside over-excited prophecies both good and ill for them.
The Bronze Age meant new weapons for fighting men as well as hunting animals for food; but also meant a flowering of functional and aesthetic applications.
The Renaissance was a great advance in the harts and learning, leading to the Age of Enlightment as people started to question age-old dogmas and fears, and started to understand the world and Space.
1) "Hens will stop laying, cows will stop lactating!"
2) "The human body cannot withstand travelling at more than thirty miles per hour!" (Before anyone did travel faster than on a galloping horse.)
3) "We will all have 'flying cars'."
4) "Cities will be giant metropolises of buildings a mile high"
5) "Men will use these to look through women's clothes!"
6) "We will colonise other planets" (which ones?)
What were those on?
1 and 2: Common fears about the new-fangled railway trains. Soon proven nonsense.
3 and 4: Assorted futurists's ideas popular in the mid-Twentieth Century. Neither has come about, apart from the dreary spread of high-rise ugliness to make all cities look like bland copies of New York.
5: Fear of X-Ray machines. Soon proven nonsense. (Though I do wish lazy, present-day journalists would stop wrongly calling personal security scanners in airports, "X-Ray Machines". )
6) Still common, encouraged by Elon Musk's dreams, as "the" answer to humanity's basic problem - over-population with diminishing resources. Yet no other planet in the Solar System can support Earthly life, the nearest possible alternatives if any exist at all are many years' of travel distant, and extra-terrestrial colonising would not solve the problem.
...
Will developments in computing and the Internet be good or bad? Very hard to know, but they are already bringing both very good and very bad.
They won't "take over" anyone, but I am concerned that life is becoming ever more constrained by their uses, as commerce uses them to drive narrower and narrower choice of ways to do things, and ultimately choice of things.
I do fear they are leading to a new Age though: the Age of Ignorance, based on new forms of superstition, dogma, deceit - not malevolent faerie-folk but malevolent people .
These are not characteristics of the computers, though; but of their owners and users.
.....
There is a further, real fear yet to be addressed: depletion.
Our society world-wide relies ever more on just two basic minerals: iron-ore and petroleum. Both are finite but at least iron and its plethora of alloys (the steels) are re-useable, with some attitition. Whether we stop using petroleum fuels or not, petroleum is NOT a "fossil-fuel", we will run out of it sooner or later, and then what.....?
No amount of computer power can replace those, even if it proves still possible to have computers without petroleum derivatives and a range of metals.
Our descendants will not be "taken over" by "technology" - whatever that is - but by themselves. Yet they will need ensure they have the engineering they will need, with what they will have; if they want anywhere near the standards of life we take for granted now.
