Gun control in the US.
Is there a good argument for NOT limiting the weapons to which civilians have access? Like these AR-15s or whatever. How is making them illegal a bad thing?
Tell me!
Tell me!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
1-25 of 37
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@SW-User I know it
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User "People who think AR-15s should be legal get-off on not giving a shit about other people."
Got anything besides logical fallacy? I didn't think so.
Got anything besides logical fallacy? I didn't think so.
SW-User
Fallacy is subjective, but logical fallacy will require a proof for me to take you seriously. @Booyeah
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User "will require a proof for me to take you seriously."
Ironic.
Ironic.
SW-User
Okay, but where have I made an illogical conclusion?@Booyeah
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User "People who think AR-15s should be legal get-off on not giving a shit about other people"
Right here.
Right here.
SW-User
@Booyeah my apologies, we’re not operating on the same plane. You don’t understand what I am asking.
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User No, I understand that you fail to recognize your error.
SW-User
You are not engaging in critical logical criticism because you haven’t been educated how. I could do a better job against my own opinion.@Booyeah
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User Yes, I understand that in addition to failing to recognize your initial logical fallacy you're in the process of committing another one.
SW-User
@Booyeah you won’t say why my statement is illogical. You don’t have the tools
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User I actually pointed out exactly why it is illogical when I noticed the irony of your statement on proof.
No surprise you didn't catch that either.
No surprise you didn't catch that either.
SW-User
@Booyeah irony implies in intent, not illogic.
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User So you intend, at some point in the future, to prove your assertions?
SW-User
The burden of proof is on you. I made a comment and other than saying “no” you have offered nothing.@Booyeah
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User "The burden of proof is on you"
Sweet, another logical fallacy. You're racking them up.
Sweet, another logical fallacy. You're racking them up.
SW-User
Shall I do your part so u can learn something?@Booyeah
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User 
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User You actually have to know something in order to teach it.
You're way behind.
You're way behind.
SW-User
@Booyeah Nope, you have the grievance so the burden is on the moving party. Class of 2000
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User False. Try again.
SW-User
Non responsive. Try again.@Booyeah
Booyeah · 41-45, M
@SW-User Still waiting for proof of your assertions.
1-25 of 37