This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Reason10 · 70-79, M
Boys and girls, regardless of the LIE the goose stepping left has spewed concerning conservatives and liberals, the FACT of the matter is those two specifications DIDN'T EVEN EXIST as the same entities back when the Democrats supported slavery and Republicans freed the slaves.
As I have attempted to educate people here (which apparently is impossible since we have a bunch of Downs Syndrome blue state idiots who are impossible to educate,)
the term LIBERAL as it is used today began in the early Sixties with the Port Huron Statement. (Today's liberalism being Marxism, racism, entitlement, etc)
Before the Port Huron Statement, LIBERAL meant Laissez Faire free market Capitalism. Seriously, do you know ANY goose stepping DemoNAZIS who believe in free market capitalism?
Conservatism used to mean a total aversion to any kind of change.
In the Sixties, Seventies, and Eighties, brilliant economists like William F. Buckley, R. Emmett Tyrell, Ronald Reagan, etc formulated conservatism to mean free markets, the CONSTITUTION, the rule of law and world peace.
Only an IDIOT would want liberalism and THIS for America.
As I have attempted to educate people here (which apparently is impossible since we have a bunch of Downs Syndrome blue state idiots who are impossible to educate,)
the term LIBERAL as it is used today began in the early Sixties with the Port Huron Statement. (Today's liberalism being Marxism, racism, entitlement, etc)
Before the Port Huron Statement, LIBERAL meant Laissez Faire free market Capitalism. Seriously, do you know ANY goose stepping DemoNAZIS who believe in free market capitalism?
Conservatism used to mean a total aversion to any kind of change.
In the Sixties, Seventies, and Eighties, brilliant economists like William F. Buckley, R. Emmett Tyrell, Ronald Reagan, etc formulated conservatism to mean free markets, the CONSTITUTION, the rule of law and world peace.
Only an IDIOT would want liberalism and THIS for America.
jehova · 31-35, M
@Reason10 u realize u are a socialist workers party member; at your age. . Do u collect social security? I conclude you must be a benefiting member of americas "socialist programs" using the acrynm for the system u represent. In order to gain views and search results on google with an offensive acronym makes you worse then those u are attempting to label.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jehova · 31-35, M
@Reason10 i call it government i worked for government as an employee ur old enough to remember wwii as a pending threat. Eiher get a job or get out of the way. Social supports arent socialism. Its responsible. U dont collect retirement or social security? Did u or your child ever attend public school or university? How about focusing on issue like not funding wars to protect other countries and instead use that money for our citizens. I work; do u old timer?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jehova · 31-35, M
@Reason10 the dollar and financial system are supported entirely by the government and federal reserve sure products and industry are produced by the "private sector" but in the end all currency is a government iou piece of cloth. Its printed on cotton not paper. So again pleaee GFY.

SW-User
jehova · 31-35, M
@SW-User im not crying; but you are. I made my point you r the one denying reality.

SW-User
@jehova
Oh, the Fed is part of the government?
🤡
The dollar and financial system are supported entirely by the government and federal reserve
Oh, the Fed is part of the government?
🤡