“The Case for an American Constitutional Monarchy”

Poll - Total Votes: 21

America will become a constitutional monarchy with Donald Trump as king, and I want that

America will by become a constitutional monarchy with Donald Trump as king, but I don't want that

I want America to become a constitutional monarchy with Donald Trump as king, but it won't happen

America will not become a constitutional monarchy with Donald Trump as king, and I don't want it to

Show Results

You can only vote on one answer.

“The argument is being made now in the United States that democracy has reached the end of its efficacy and usefulness. A rapidly growing number of Republicans and Christian Nationalists have seen the light and realize that our great nation has turned a corner.

“Our Lord God, in His wisdom and benevolence, has provided his faithful servants with a Divinely inspired leader who can finally transform our exceptional country into the nation it was always intended to be. This leader, sent and directed by God, is an outsider to the current political system, is disdainful of Washington's denizens and minions, and is the pure embodiment of truth, honesty, and selflessness that is required to purge our homeland of the scourge that infests our government at every level. Although merely human, and so inherently flawed, this leader is as close to Perfection as any human is capable of being under God's continued guidance and inspiration. As God's chosen vessel, our One True Leader is unimpeachable and above reproach, and His name is Donald Trump. My faithful and pious brothers and sisters, we are witnessing biblical prophecy manifest in our lifetimes. This is a Divine privilege and obligation beyond measure.

“We all have a Sacred Duty to listen and adhere to the words and dictates of our One True Leader. And He has spoken clearly and often. This is some of what He has said:

1. “The Democratic Party is comprised overwhelmingly of 'sleazy,' 'horrible people' who want to tear our country apart.
2. “Democrats are not capable of winning any election unless they lie, cheat and commit fraud. If a Democrat wins, it is only due to a rigged election. Otherwise, there would be absolutely no Democrats in office. Anywhere. (This particular point is incredibly important, and something that our One True Leader, Donald Trump, has been repeatedly trying to teach us for years.)
3. “These Servants of Satan, these Democrats, have been poisoning government since our nation's founding, and they will never willingly give up their power. There is no act of evil Democrats are unwilling to commit, nothing too vile or Unholy, to stay in power and occupy offices that should always have been graced by loyal members of the One True Party.

“His message is clear to all who can see and hear. Donald Trump is telling us that there is no need for elections anymore. There is no need for more than one party. Democrats are evil and irredeemable. Many are not even human; they are demons in human form and need to be destroyed. The Democratic party must be eliminated and erased from our great Nation’s governing institutions, as well as our culture, history and memory.

“We know that Donald Trump does not lie. He speaks only the truth. That one shining Axiom can serve as our guiding principle in the difficult days ahead as we fight this Holy War. When we are troubled by doubt and indecision, tempted by our enemies’ lies and deceitful distractions, we must simply remember the words and dictates of our One True Leader. Anything and everything he says is Truth and inspired by our Lord God. We can and must believe in him without reservation and with all our hearts minds and souls. If we just remember this one irrefutable fact, that Donald Trump is the earthly embodiment of Truth and Goodness, we will prevail and destroy our enemies.

“How do we know our enemies? It is very easy. Whoever speaks against Donald Trump serves Satan. No further thought need be given to this plain and simple fact. All who refuse to accept Donald Trump as our Divinely inspired One True Leader must be eliminated from society and erased from our collective memories.

“So what is next? We know beyond any doubt that democracy is no longer necessary. This system of human governance was a flawed and awkward amalgam of distasteful compromises in order to hold us together as a nation until we could break free from the chains of our enemies. That time has come.

“With Democrats banned from our society and eventually cast from this Earth, there's no need for the people to “choose" a leader. He has already been provided for us by God. There will be no dissenting views that contradict those of our One True Leader. There will be no Truth except that declared by Donald Trump. And there is no human on the planet who can usurp Donald Trump's place as God's vessel on Earth.

“What follows is inevitable and preordained. Donald Trump is the government, and the government is Donald Trump. We are seeing the birth of a constitutional monarchy, in which Donald Trump will soon be crowned as America's sovereign. He will then write a new American Constitution, which will be recognized the world over as the literal word of God. Divinely inspired, He alone will determine His successor, and His Majesty's Legacy will endure for millennia. His reign is destined to be awesome and glorious. And His people, those who survive and accept Him, will hold dominion over the Earth. Eventually, all will bow before Him!”

So how many people are in line with what I just copied and pasted here? Are you guys on board for this? Do you think it makes sense? Do you agree with the three points that Donald Trump makes? Or do you think it's crazy?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

1. “The Democratic Party is comprised overwhelmingly of 'sleazy,' 'horrible people' who want to tear our country apart. True
2. “Democrats are not capable of winning any election unless they lie, cheat and commit fraud. If a Democrat wins, it is only due to a rigged election. Otherwise, there would be absolutely no Democrats in office. Anywhere. (This particular point is incredibly important, and something that our One True Leader, Donald Trump, has been repeatedly trying to teach us for years.) True. They aren't even above hurting their own for an election! LBJ likely pulled the strings to get rid of Kennedy to seize power of the Vietnam war machine.
3. “These Servants of Satan, these Democrats, have been poisoning government since our nation's founding, and they will never willingly give up their power. There is no act of evil Democrats are unwilling to commit, nothing too vile or Unholy, to stay in power and occupy offices that should always have been graced by loyal members of the One True Party. True to a degree. I would say the first switch flipped with FDR, and the second one flipped with LBJ, and the final switch flipped with Obama.

Please see my comments in bold within the quote.
Now, do I think that we should be a constitutional monarchy? No. We are a constitutional republic and should stay as such. Government should be smaller, not larger. Our country was founded on a small, non intrusive goverment, and the only ones pushing for a big overbearing government is the democrats!

Graylight · 51-55, F

@ShadowWolf Your little "non-obtrusive" government is denying anyone they can find their liberties. Good use of your tax money. It applies to your freedoms, too.

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

@Graylight Currently? Yes, because Biden is in office. Yes he and his big gov democrats are hurting my freedoms. Thanks for realizing that!

Graylight · 51-55, F

@ShadowWolf No, this has nothing to do with Biden. This is Trump's scotus, you fool.

Biden has taken away not one single one of your rights.

LeopoldBloom · M

@ShadowWolf LBJ didn’t kill JFK.

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

@Graylight The court doesn't take away rights. And it didn't take away any rights. Learn how the system works. The democrats are overwhelmingly pro tax, pro regulation, pro censorship, anti-business, and pro big government. The facts don't lie.

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

@LeopoldBloom Oh ya? He was Kennedys VP, and Kennedy wanted to pull out of Nam. LBJ wanted to escalate it. Something tells me LBJ pulled the strings.

LeopoldBloom · M

@ShadowWolf JFK didn’t want to pull out of Vietnam. He proposed reducing the 16,000 “advisors” by 1,000. There’s no evidence LBJ killed him over that. Your feelings aren’t evidence.

The actual evidence shows Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK and acted alone.

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

@LeopoldBloom Say what you want, but new evidence comes out all the time regarding the incident. Didn't the classified docs for the case recently get released?

Graylight · 51-55, F

@ShadowWolf You ijit, the Supreme Court of the United States' task is to interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied. This results is applied or denied rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

Roe v Wade. District of Columbia, et al. v. Heller. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States. Brown v. Board of Education. Each and every one of these cases have helped decide the scope of rights extended to citizens.

The warrant for Mar-a-Slum-Den was published along with the items removed. The surveillance footage Trump's threatening to release to compromise national security will likely not be. He's already been found materially guilt fo about half a dozens things and his reputation except for you tacit sheep is ruined. Proving it in court at this point is just an exercise.

You lose. Face it.

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

@Graylight Correct. And the court reevaluated the case, and decided that it had to uphold the tenth amendment which is states rights. All it did was throw making abortion law, pro or anti, back to the states. It did not ban abortion, nor did it restrict it. The constitution does not guarantee abortion rights. It NEVER did. I don't see it written in the Bill of Rights. The 10th amendment covers both states rights and reserves citizens rights. It's a limitation to federal power. If one is unhappy with their states laws on abortion, they can deal with it close to home. Or, you can try to amend the constitution to have it explicitly enshrined like freedom of speech and guns. (Good luck getting it explicitly in there).

The case and classified docs I'm referring to is the JFK incident. Not Maralago. Funny how you go immediately to that. Typical leftist with Trump ptsd and gets triggered by keywords. Go to a therapist please.

Why do you think I like or support Trump? I don't know how many people I've had to tell on here that I don't. I'm a libertarian. Just because I believe in small government and little to no taxation does not mean I am a Trumpist. I don't "lose" anything.

Graylight · 51-55, F

@ShadowWolf It doesn't matter how the court decided on any specific case. The point is clear: they absolutely decide the status of rights in the US.

We're not talking about JFK because we're both too young, you've proven your ignorance and shown you lack of appreciation for or knowledge of debate.

I'll be sure to make the mental note that you're a Libertarian; too often we assume Trumpers abound here, and that's not always fair. Notation saved.

ShadowWolf · 31-35, M

@Graylight Indirectly? Sure. But the court alone cannot change the constitution, only uphold and interpret it. To actually change rights directly, all branches need to be involved, and a grand majority of the US population by proxy.

Why can't we talk about JFK? If we research and study up, we are just as well informed as someone in their 80s! That's like saying that we can't discuss Ancient Roman politics, or about King Louis of France because we are "too young". Research and reading history from multiple sources can play a part in being informed. For example, I can call Nero Ceasar an unfeeling jerk because he ordered his own mother to be killed. How do I know he did so even though I didn't live back then? RESEARCH. So JFK is no different.

Thank you. It would be wise to not just go blindly calling anyone who doesn't agree of your view of government or politics as a Trumper. That goes for any leftist on SW. Trumpers are but one portion of the GOP, and a small subset of the US populace. Independents, tea partiers, libertarians, constitutionalists, moderates, and many more smaller parties do exist. From the middle of the aisle to the extreme right wing. Unfortunately, anyone who doesn't agree with leftists now is automatically considered a "Trumper". And that needs to stop.