After 245 years our government wants to disarm us They would only do that only if they were planning something we would shoot them for. At least that is what history tells us.
Are we at that point yet? ⬆️
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
So in a nutshell a few men with small dicks don’t want to feel like they have had their dicks chopped off. They don’t care how many mass shootings there are in days to come as long as they can keep touching their dicks (guns).
Mass shootings are a small price to pay for the right to keep touching your dick.
@justanothername awe the small dick ploy so original how did you come up with something so powerful?
Here’s a few great question for you and those who say “don’t need a firearm because we have police” 1 are you aware that the Supreme Court rulings in Castle Rock v. Gonales and DeShany v. Winnebago that law enforcement has no constitutional duty to act or protect you? 2 how do you counter an active threat with the most effective tool of self defense? 3 why do we protect politicians with massive amounts of fire power but protect kids with an advertisement saying hey helpless individuals are over here because it’s a gun free zone?
@justanothername awe you are afraid to debate and validate your points by being dismissive because you know I’ll blow more holes in your because you don’t have the knowledge to actually debate so you hide behind dick jokes?
@ron122 most anti gun liberals have a phallic obsession because they have castrated themselves due to the idea of toxic masculinity and anti machesemo sentiments in the name of equality and social justice. Or he just like taking a fat cock to the mouth. Which I have zero issue with that preference of xe/him/they just don’t have to advertise that everywhere.
