Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why is Trump looking for the deal to put America first when the deal is about the planet NOT America, therefore, should put the planet first?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
I'm not even sure this is putting America first. I mean, these fossil fuels won't last forever anyway. Either we begin adapting now, or we leave it to later generations. Who's going to lead the world toward energy sustainability and independence? Looks like it's not the United States.
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@Xuan12: China is. They just invested 900 billion dollars into developing, patenting, and selling environmentally friendly energy sources. They're creating jobs, saving the planet, and making bitchloads of money off of it, not to mention forming alliances left and right. The yanks are too fucking stupid to know what's good for them.
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
@BlueMetalChick: Trump handed it right to them.
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@Xuan12: Duh. Just like he handed cluster bombs to the Saudis because how could that go wrong?
tindrummer · M
@BlueMetalChick: I take offense with you saying "the Yanks" as if the majority of us didn't vote for the orange crush and DO NOT deny climate change!
swirlie · 31-35, F
@tindrummer:

I agree with you, tindrummer. The word "yanks" infers 'all Americans'. Clearly, all Americans never had a say in ditching America from the Paris Accord, yet all Americans will be living proof of the obtuse perception one lone American.
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@tindrummer: Well, the majority [i]didn't[/i] vote for him. Clinton won the popular vote.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@BlueMetalChick:

True, she did win the popular vote, but technical vote count is not what is being disputed here.

Tindrummer's post wasn't about who the true winner of the pissing contest was that came of that election. His post was about the offense he had taken by your blanket use of the term "yanks", which is a derogatory term that carries an all-inclusive connotation, as if all Americans think alike, hence voted alike.
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@swirlie: As a foreigner who emigrated to the USA, the word "yank" just means American, like Aussie means Australian or Canuck means Canadian or Polak means Polish. Why would that be offensive?
swirlie · 31-35, F
@BlueMetalChick:

I understand what you meant, but a few posts up, you stated "The yanks are too fucking stupid to know what's good for them".

Where the offense was taken, was that those American (yanks) who did not agree with decisions that were made, were painted with the same brush as those Americans who DID agree with Presidential decisions that were made. I think in this case, it may have been more prudent to separate who you were really referring to, be it Democrats or Republicans.

When you said "yanks", that one word implies that Dems and Repubs and all other factions in-between, are of the same camp, hence collectively held responsible (in your view) for being a collection of stupid people residing within one nation.
BlueMetalChick · 26-30, F
@swirlie: Oh I think I see what you mean now.
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
@BlueMetalChick: Yeah, most people actually didn't vote for him.