What do you think of President Trump's charge that the previous administration abused their authority and spied on his campaign?

Don't know if it happened or not so, we are dealing with a hypothetical until more information is provided.

What I would like to know is your position on these three points.

1. Do you think the charge has a kernel of truth? Why or why not.

2. If it is true, what do you think should happen? Politically and legally?

3. If it's not true, what do you think should happen?

As a bonus please provide any sources for updates containing facts about this topic.

Thanks,

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

A FISA (totally classified and sealed) Court provided the warrant and the wiretaps existed. The sticking point is what the wiretaps revealed. Had the information been actionable it already would have happened. Net result is the libs using the where there is smoke there must be fire technique simply because there were wiretaps while attempting to obsucsre the fact that the wiretaps revealed zip. Case closed. The president's tweets today were nothing more than his taking a victory lap.