Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to die. But....
When debating whether it's possible to be a gender other than what's assigned at birth, why did he debate college students and not geneticists?
When debating whether 10-year-old girls should be forced to give birth, why did he debate college students and not childhood trauma experts?
When debating whether DEI or affirmative action should exist, why did debate college students and not historians?
His goal wasn’t fair debate. His goal wasn’t truth. His goal wasn’t free speech. His goal was to humiliate people who want to stand up for vulnerable people, but have only very recently been even allowed to do that so they’re likely to phrase something wrong or not know how to respond on the spot.
It was notable when he debated a room full of Cambridge students, people who actually knew their stuff and how to respond, they tore him to shreds.
He did NOT deserve to die; but he was a racist, bullying POS.
When debating whether 10-year-old girls should be forced to give birth, why did he debate college students and not childhood trauma experts?
When debating whether DEI or affirmative action should exist, why did debate college students and not historians?
His goal wasn’t fair debate. His goal wasn’t truth. His goal wasn’t free speech. His goal was to humiliate people who want to stand up for vulnerable people, but have only very recently been even allowed to do that so they’re likely to phrase something wrong or not know how to respond on the spot.
It was notable when he debated a room full of Cambridge students, people who actually knew their stuff and how to respond, they tore him to shreds.
He did NOT deserve to die; but he was a racist, bullying POS.
