Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
Euthanasia is only allowed in the case of severe suffering with no hope of improvement. It's a long process where all other options are considered first.
emiliya · 26-30, F
@Kwek00 [media=https://youtu.be/2cy32nfXJbs]
emiliya · 26-30, F
@Kwek00 [media=https://youtu.be/lTwsLCPD7UM]
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@emiliya I guess I triggered the script...

MoveAlong · 70-79, M
If I'm suffering horribly with no hope and can't do it myself shoot me or inject me please.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@MoveAlong
I've just had two friends of mine in the past 6 months go through the process of assisted suicide. They both had cancer, but the process is very streamlined and quick and easy here in Canada, though you have to show reasonable grounds for doing this.

Many Americans come to Canada to go through this process because the States they often live in are so ultra conservative that they're governing authority would rather see someone suffer like a rabid dog than to witness some licensed physician put them out of their misery in 3 easy steps.

You don't need a medical plan to have this done in Canada, but we still take cash here.. $ ..and VISA is also accepted if you're using plastic.. but not American Express.
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
@swirlie Euthanasia should be universally available. There is no sensible argument against it. In my opinion it should be available on demand with limited red tape.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@MoveAlong
...but you have to remember that you live in the USA and what is considered 'normal' and 'universally available' around the world, isn't necessarily embraced by America's evangelical base. Therein lies the dead-end of the road for most Americans for most things in life that the rest of the world simply takes for granted as being readily available because it makes sense.
Northwest · M
It's participation and support in killing healthy viable people,

Except that they're not.

In 2024, the law was extended to allow children under the age of 12 to be euthanized if the child is “terminally ill and is suffering unbearably with no prospect of improvement.
sree251 · 41-45, M
@Northwest
I would hope that people who love me are strong enough to relieve me from a miserable situation of need be.

I love you, and I am strong enough to end the miserable life you are living. Give me the word, man.
Northwest · M
@sree251
I love you, and I am strong enough to end the miserable life you are living. Give me the word, man.

Are you on some Indian hallucinate. Again?
sree251 · 41-45, M
@Northwest
Are you on some Indian hallucinate. Again?

Don't change the subject. Do you want to go or not? What kind of job are you doing for a living, man?
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
OMG, how, why?
Convivial · 26-30, F
I think there law prevents healthy viable people from participating
sree251 · 41-45, M
@emiliya
Who is healthy? No body is perfect.

True, but the crazies are something else.
emiliya · 26-30, F
@Convivial And? The Nazis also fulfiled their requirements. Just three days ago it was the 85th anniversary of Operation Barbarossa. Like euthanasia, a lot of people thought Barbarossa was a good idea.
emiliya · 26-30, F
@Convivial The Taliban has requirements. They are the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and can make any laws they want. I bet you don't agree with Taliban laws. You want to go to school so you can sit and study women and gender.
Waveney · M
It's participation and support in killing healthy viable people, not to mention their babies, has been ongoing since Bosnia in 1995.

Except that's not true.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
swirlie · 31-35, F
@Waveney
🤷🏼‍♀ ...I tried to warn you but you wouldn't listen.
Waveney · M
@swirlie oh I know what he’s like. He always ends up hoisted by his own petard.

Thanks for the heads up tho 🙂
Elessar · 31-35, M
"Healthy" is the keyword. If you resort to euthanasia you're not.

Also NATO is a military alliance, the f*ck does it have to do with this? Lol

 
Post Comment