Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Did Iran Present An Immediate Danger?

Hearing happening today in DC.

Director of CIA: Yes, because Iran was working on ballistic missiles. OK, but this was not an immediate danger.

Tulsi Gabbard: No. Iran did not resume work on its nuclear program after we hit them a few months ago, and is not capable of hitting the US.

I expect Trump to berate Gabbard.

As in aside, if Trump thought Iran presents a clear and immediate threat, why did he have Gabbard, his Director of Intelligence devote herself to supervising the raid on the Georgia elections offices, looking for evidence that he won the 2020 elections. Shouldn't the former be her full time job?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
People have said that Iran has been two weeks away from nuclear weapons for the last twenty years. No evidence has been presented.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Burnley123 Thirty, more like.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Northwest I mean Netanyahu, yes. Also John Bolton and the the US hawks.