Malaysia Tears Up Trump Deal, Trade Leverage COLLAPSES
Other countries could follow.
[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW9ktCDdgCM]
[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW9ktCDdgCM]
36-40, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
swirlie · 31-35, F
She said anything of great relevance within the first 60 seconds of this video and everything she said after that, though factually true in content, serve as nothing but background noise after-the-fact to the 'bottom line' she had already established from the outset of her video. That's where the video should have ended.
My recommendation to anyone watching this video is to watch it for about 2 minutes, then bail. Excellent points were made in reference to Malaysia and I'm sure other nations will follow suit.
My recommendation to anyone watching this video is to watch it for about 2 minutes, then bail. Excellent points were made in reference to Malaysia and I'm sure other nations will follow suit.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@swirlie Take that up with her, I'm not the content creator.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@SatanBurger
...but you are the content editor, right?
I ran into this same issue last week with @KunstanVeteran about a video he submitted that was 35 minutes long, bringing to his attention that it's content creator was nothing more than a rambling airhead that never did get to the point she was trying to make in her video.
His only response to me was that he posted the video WITHOUT actually watching it first himself and had no idea what it's content was technically about, of which I called him out on.
Posting shit-videos like he did JUST for the sake of posting something of political relevance for the benefit of his reading audience, is nothing but pure bullshitte. I don't watch any of his videos anymore, now that I know he doesn't edit the content of the videos that he posts before posting them.
...but you are the content editor, right?
I ran into this same issue last week with @KunstanVeteran about a video he submitted that was 35 minutes long, bringing to his attention that it's content creator was nothing more than a rambling airhead that never did get to the point she was trying to make in her video.
His only response to me was that he posted the video WITHOUT actually watching it first himself and had no idea what it's content was technically about, of which I called him out on.
Posting shit-videos like he did JUST for the sake of posting something of political relevance for the benefit of his reading audience, is nothing but pure bullshitte. I don't watch any of his videos anymore, now that I know he doesn't edit the content of the videos that he posts before posting them.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@swirlie I don't edit people's videos and I do watch them.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@SatanBurger
Of course you cannot edit other people's videos, but that is not what I meant.
What I meant was, if you watch their video and it sucks, or they take way too long to establish any relevance to what they made the video about in the first place, then do your part by editing their video from YOUR own posts.
That's how you edit other people's videos, by not including them in your collection of videos.
Of course you cannot edit other people's videos, but that is not what I meant.
What I meant was, if you watch their video and it sucks, or they take way too long to establish any relevance to what they made the video about in the first place, then do your part by editing their video from YOUR own posts.
That's how you edit other people's videos, by not including them in your collection of videos.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@SatanBurger
I'm not asking you to agree with me, but I am asking you to watch each video yourself first, before you post it for everyone else to watch. When you post a video, you are effectively endorsing it by carrying it on your SW feed. If you haven't watched it first yourself, then you can't endorse something you haven't actually watched. That woman in your video repeated herself at least 3 times, saying exactly the same thing 3 times in a row, sounding like a skipping record on a turntable.
I'm not asking you to agree with me, but I am asking you to watch each video yourself first, before you post it for everyone else to watch. When you post a video, you are effectively endorsing it by carrying it on your SW feed. If you haven't watched it first yourself, then you can't endorse something you haven't actually watched. That woman in your video repeated herself at least 3 times, saying exactly the same thing 3 times in a row, sounding like a skipping record on a turntable.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@swirlie I did watch it and it said what the title says, I was very clear.
swirlie · 31-35, F
@SatanBurger
Yes, that is totally correct. The video talks about what the title says and I'm not disputing that at all.
She said anything of great relevance within the first 60 seconds of this video and everything she said after that, though factually true in content, served as nothing but repetitive background noise after-the-fact to the 'bottom line' she had already established from the outset of her video.
Yes, that is totally correct. The video talks about what the title says and I'm not disputing that at all.
She said anything of great relevance within the first 60 seconds of this video and everything she said after that, though factually true in content, served as nothing but repetitive background noise after-the-fact to the 'bottom line' she had already established from the outset of her video.