This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Charity · 70-79
I don't support the bombing but I don't support having a military base within yards of a school and a clinic
Bomb the military base your bomb the school and clinic. A tactic that didn't work with Trump, Trump is the one that don't care.
Bomb the military base your bomb the school and clinic. A tactic that didn't work with Trump, Trump is the one that don't care.
Miram · 31-35, F
@Charity
There are numerous military facilities in the United States located directly adjacent to, or co-located with, civilian facilities.
This, often referred to as "joint-use," is common for airfields, ports, and urban training areas and military clinics all over the world.
All current evidence indicates this wasn't a case of Iranians using a human shield
It was on you. They were PRECISION strikes.
There are numerous military facilities in the United States located directly adjacent to, or co-located with, civilian facilities.
This, often referred to as "joint-use," is common for airfields, ports, and urban training areas and military clinics all over the world.
All current evidence indicates this wasn't a case of Iranians using a human shield
It was on you. They were PRECISION strikes.
Charity · 70-79
@Waveney
Well like many people do whenever this is presented before them they deny it as proof or say it was Doctored or say it was made up.
https://www.npr.org/2026/03/04/nx-s1-5735801/satellite-imagery-shows-strike-that-destroyed-iranian-school-was-more-extensive-than-first-reported#:~:text=Iranian%20state%20media%20said%20165,walled%20off%20from%20the%20base
https://iranwire.com/en/news/149945-iran-using-schools-and-universities-to-house-military-personnel/#:~:text=A%20former%20government%20official%20who,place%20in%20a%20hospital%20setting
Well like many people do whenever this is presented before them they deny it as proof or say it was Doctored or say it was made up.
https://www.npr.org/2026/03/04/nx-s1-5735801/satellite-imagery-shows-strike-that-destroyed-iranian-school-was-more-extensive-than-first-reported#:~:text=Iranian%20state%20media%20said%20165,walled%20off%20from%20the%20base
https://iranwire.com/en/news/149945-iran-using-schools-and-universities-to-house-military-personnel/#:~:text=A%20former%20government%20official%20who,place%20in%20a%20hospital%20setting
Charity · 70-79
@Miram they're not on me.... Precision strikes: a 100 or less yards that is a precision strike...... And that close can't help but bomb adjacent buildings.
And yes us have military bases in the area of neighborhoods..... And they have the sense enough to know if they put military bases in neighborhoods and somebody sends bombs over here the neighborhoods are going to suffer too..... You and Iran act like the US did it on purpose...... If you put a school or a medical facility for civilians within yards of a military base expect casualties especially when you are a group that support terrorist.
And yes us have military bases in the area of neighborhoods..... And they have the sense enough to know if they put military bases in neighborhoods and somebody sends bombs over here the neighborhoods are going to suffer too..... You and Iran act like the US did it on purpose...... If you put a school or a medical facility for civilians within yards of a military base expect casualties especially when you are a group that support terrorist.
Miram · 31-35, F
@Waveney
Yes, there is no evidence for it.
Human rights watch and US military investigators have already made statements the building has been a school since 2016.
And legally speaking, even if there is evidence, the US is obliged to wait for a time when kids aren't attending the school.
Otherwise, it still constitutes a war crime.
To put it simply.
Yes, there is no evidence for it.
Human rights watch and US military investigators have already made statements the building has been a school since 2016.
And legally speaking, even if there is evidence, the US is obliged to wait for a time when kids aren't attending the school.
Otherwise, it still constitutes a war crime.
To put it simply.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@Charity they had no such targets there.
You will always excuse your obvious genocidal cruelty. It's USA or peace, USA or freedom, USA or having a future. You're never going to stop you always have excuses!!!
You will always excuse your obvious genocidal cruelty. It's USA or peace, USA or freedom, USA or having a future. You're never going to stop you always have excuses!!!
Charity · 70-79
@Roundandroundwego
Here you go again, and accusing me of genocidal cruelty. Take your accusations ____.
Person, I go by the news report / someone who thinks like you will say they are false reports. Well you just keep on thinking that way. Time for me to end conversing with you.
Here you go again, and accusing me of genocidal cruelty. Take your accusations ____.
Person, I go by the news report / someone who thinks like you will say they are false reports. Well you just keep on thinking that way. Time for me to end conversing with you.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@Charity the school was the first target the US struck this time, during negotiations,, one hour after the US said the talks were going well. And I am certain it's fine for both red and blue no matter who. I'm sure it's the best we'll ever get from Washington, submitting and getting hit!
Miram · 31-35, F
@Charity
You are far gone.
You think of others as terrorists while you hold their same beliefs= civilian deaths are justifiable.
Acknowledging that civilian harm was foreseeable is not claiming it was intentional btw; it is insisting that power carries responsibility for the consequences it knowingly risks. I don't care about your intent. Why would I care for your intent?
Read that over and over.
Precision means the military knew where the weapon would land, that is why I am bringing up it is PRECISION strike, which makes the civilian risk foreseeable rather than accidental. It is calculated.
The intent beyond doing it doesn't bring back the dead.
You make two different claims btw..inconsistent. You want it to be seen as unintentional but you also proceed to argue it is justifiable.
I would ask you to construct a better argument but I don't truly care what someone like you thinks at this point. Someone who wants kids to bear the responsibility of what their governments do or don't do.
You're beyond saving. And completely irrational.
You are far gone.
You think of others as terrorists while you hold their same beliefs= civilian deaths are justifiable.
Acknowledging that civilian harm was foreseeable is not claiming it was intentional btw; it is insisting that power carries responsibility for the consequences it knowingly risks. I don't care about your intent. Why would I care for your intent?
Read that over and over.
Precision means the military knew where the weapon would land, that is why I am bringing up it is PRECISION strike, which makes the civilian risk foreseeable rather than accidental. It is calculated.
The intent beyond doing it doesn't bring back the dead.
You make two different claims btw..inconsistent. You want it to be seen as unintentional but you also proceed to argue it is justifiable.
I would ask you to construct a better argument but I don't truly care what someone like you thinks at this point. Someone who wants kids to bear the responsibility of what their governments do or don't do.
You're beyond saving. And completely irrational.
Charity · 70-79
@Miram
Here is another one telling me what I think person you don't know me you don't know what I think.... To walk into a club and kill four people and wound 11 others is an act of a terrorist and wearing a Iranian shirt shows it
https://www.amny.com/news/gracie-mansion-bomb-suspects-jailed-terrorism-charges/
Trying to bomb people is this male did in New York is a attempted act of terrorism
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/suspect-in-texas-bar-shooting-wore-property-of-allah-clothing-and-iranian-flag-emblem-according-to-ap-source
The actions speak for theirself if a person or country does ii they are.
I don't support civilian casualties person nor do I support war person.
What I speak, I speak honestly because it's the truth. And I'm finding you can't handle the truth, you take it and twist it. Well you keep on doing that
goodbye
Here is another one telling me what I think person you don't know me you don't know what I think.... To walk into a club and kill four people and wound 11 others is an act of a terrorist and wearing a Iranian shirt shows it
https://www.amny.com/news/gracie-mansion-bomb-suspects-jailed-terrorism-charges/
Trying to bomb people is this male did in New York is a attempted act of terrorism
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/suspect-in-texas-bar-shooting-wore-property-of-allah-clothing-and-iranian-flag-emblem-according-to-ap-source
The actions speak for theirself if a person or country does ii they are.
I don't support civilian casualties person nor do I support war person.
What I speak, I speak honestly because it's the truth. And I'm finding you can't handle the truth, you take it and twist it. Well you keep on doing that
goodbye
SinlessOnslaught · M
@Charity You're the reason people hate our country.







