According to sources in Iran the US has lost two supply ships one of them out in the Indian Oceans. On a related note. The USS Gerald R Ford has gone dark. Hmmmm
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
"Iran’s clerical regime now faces the prospect of trying to find a successor to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei following his killing in joint US-Israeli strikes.
The veteran leader, who ruled with an iron fist for nearly four decades, does not have an officially declared heir. Instead, an elected body of 88 senior clerics, known as the Assembly of Experts, will select the next leader.
It’s a task that has only been carried out by the clerical body once since the Islamic Republic was established in 1979, when Khamenei was hastily chosen on the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini more than three decades ago."
@Thinkerbell Well according to reports I have read Iran had planned to be attacked by the axis of evil AKA ISA (Israeli States of America) and all its leaders chose their successors. So you kill one leader and another takes his place. Deaths happen. Kennedy was shot by Israel and the US didn't collapse.
@Thinkerbell No one believes the other side's source. Give it up. Lets try logic instead of my information source is better than your information source. The logic is simple. Death among leaders happen. Look at what happened with the death of Hitler. Germany continued to fight even though it was so beaten and so depleted its people were starving to death. Iran is not in that condition and it is doing a yeoman's job defending itself against the ISA.
"Look at what happened with the death of Hitler. Germany continued to fight even though it was so beaten and so depleted its people were starving to death."
Oh, yes indeed... Germany kept fighting for about 8 days after Hitler's suicide.
Germany would have given up about 9 months earlier if von Stauffenberg's bomb plot had succeeded in July of 1944.
"Lets try logic instead of my information source is better than your information source."
I didn't say my source is better than your source; I just said your source, so far, is undisclosed, and perhaps just a figment of your fevered imagination.
@Thinkerbell Still with the irrelevant sources? Really? No wonder you lose every debate you start. You just aren't bright enough to figure out what is relevant to the discussion and what is not. Sources are not relevant to this discussion and you can't figure that out!!!!! TOO FUNNY!!!!!
@Thinkerbell So you didn't listen to the American commentator give actual statistics? Amazing. See how easy it is to critique 'sources'? Now run along little girl. You just aren't that bright.
Yes, I listened to his cherry-picked "statistics." I also looked up his pro-Russian record:
"Johnson defended Russia from allegations that it interfered in the 2016 presidential election. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Johnson has made regular appearances on Russian media and expressed support for its war effort. He has been cited hundreds of times in pro-Kremlin Russian media, including Izvestia, Sputnik, and RIA Novosti. In March 2025, Johnson was one of three media personalities invited to interview Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_C._Johnson
So I stand corrected. Russia probably goes halfsies with Iran in paying for Johnson's youtube account. 😂 😂 😂
It did NO such thing, hippy. On the contrary, from p 22 of Vol 1 of the Mueller Report:
The Internet Research Agency (IRA) was a Russian organization that carried out online propaganda and disinformation campaigns, aimed at influencing U.S. elections. It wouldn't surprise me if Johnson was one of their operatives or at least a useful i—d—i—o—t.
Speaking of which, I hope you're being paid, hippy... you're missing out if you're doing your nonsense for free. 😂 😂 😂
