His husband!? Her wife!? What's going on?
My head is getting turned around these day by incorrect use of the English language.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
@sree251 says
Maybe you should be addressing the fact that the federal government violated 96 court orders in less than ONE MONTH!!! It might be an even bigger deal than men having husbands.
This is the appendix mentioned by Judge Schlitz with the list of court orders violated by ICE
https://kstp.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Habeas-Cases-with-Order-Non-Compliance-Jan-28-2026.pdf
As someone who has spent years studying math beyond calculus, I can assure you that English does NOT function like math.
"I saw the man with the binoculars" (who had the binoculars?)
"The chicken is ready to eat" (is the chicken cooked or hungry?).
"I watched her duck"
"The peasants are revolting"
"Look at the dog with one eye"
"They are cooking apples"
I can assure you that math does NOT allow this level of ambiguity.
It's my problem when the federal government is not running the country as a well-ordered society.
Maybe you should be addressing the fact that the federal government violated 96 court orders in less than ONE MONTH!!! It might be an even bigger deal than men having husbands.
... on Wednesday, Patrick Schiltz, the chief judge for the U.S. District Court of Minnesota, issued a remarkable order that cataloged a total of 96 court orders that he said ICE had violated in 74 different cases. “ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026,” the judge wrote, “than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.”
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230171/gov.uscourts.mnd.230171.10.0_2.pdf?regi_id=216074662&template_id=1545&tracking_id=biza-1hFvPdxv6r7xijyl-variant-0&user_id=9bcd0d71fb7660c3554b4fb55bffa75aThis is the appendix mentioned by Judge Schlitz with the list of court orders violated by ICE
https://kstp.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Habeas-Cases-with-Order-Non-Compliance-Jan-28-2026.pdf
The English language functions like the language of mathematics.
As someone who has spent years studying math beyond calculus, I can assure you that English does NOT function like math.
"I saw the man with the binoculars" (who had the binoculars?)
"The chicken is ready to eat" (is the chicken cooked or hungry?).
"I watched her duck"
"The peasants are revolting"
"Look at the dog with one eye"
"They are cooking apples"
I can assure you that math does NOT allow this level of ambiguity.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Northwest · M
@sree251
You need a remedial English course. Enough for you to understand the the difference between "ours" and "Your."
You could start by accepting that the customs of your country of origin are outdated in the USA, or back to whatever hole you came from.
Read the Constitution, ours
Your Constitution
You need a remedial English course. Enough for you to understand the the difference between "ours" and "Your."
I am not as capable as you in grasping gutter culture and present that as the American way of life.
You could start by accepting that the customs of your country of origin are outdated in the USA, or back to whatever hole you came from.
SarahAndSamantha · 51-55, T
sree251 · 41-45, M
@dancingtongue
Same sex marriage as in Tom marrying Peter or Mary marrying Jane?? Who gets to be the wife and who gets to be the husband? Or are they are both husbands to one another or both wives to one another. Are you following this? Can you follow this?
What is unclear? Obviously the statement means it is a same-sex marriage.
Same sex marriage as in Tom marrying Peter or Mary marrying Jane?? Who gets to be the wife and who gets to be the husband? Or are they are both husbands to one another or both wives to one another. Are you following this? Can you follow this?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment