How Many Violent Criminal Gang Members Have Been Arrested in Minnesota?

@RogueLodyte


No, that's how many families they've broken up.

@MoveAlong Read & weep
https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/under-president-trumps-leadership-ice-has-arrested-members-some-worlds-most-dangerous
You mean gangs.

@RogueLodyte Link to arrests, arraignments and trial information please. There should be several hundred at least.

@MoveAlong Why? So whiney liberal ilk like @Northwest can attack the government sources? 😂

@RogueLodyte


Yes, and me too.

@RogueLodyte tell me whats it like to be your age and never had a woman willingly talk to you? Hating other people because of their skin color is the most cringe incel thing in existence.

@Captainjackass The race card. 😂 The last dying retort of a vanquished liberal.

@RogueLodyte https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/percentage-ice-arrests-criminal-vs-civil-2f3f82
This is a summation. 74% have no prior conviction, but there can still be 2,500 bad guys. Your numbers are from ICE itself which is a bit of a red flag.

DHS and ICE deploy selective statistics and narrative framing to emphasize public-safety rationales. DHS press releases assert that the agency is arresting “the worst of the worst” and have claimed that 70–75% of arrests were of accused or convicted criminals in specific periods [3] [7]. Those statements rely on ICE categorizations that can include people “charged” or “convicted,” and they typically describe enforcement priorities rather than the composition of the detained population at a point in time [3] [7]. Independent trackers caution that ICE’s published arrest counts may undercount some categories and that “collateral” arrests—when multiple people are taken into custody during an operation—inflate detainee numbers who have no criminal records [4] [8].

@JimboSaturn What's so funny, it actually supports both views somewhat, just more of a non-partisan summation.

@JimboSaturn What's funny is how people on social media think that THEIR gub'ment statistics and links are more valid than mine.
I don't trust ANYTHING from the government. I facetiously posted MY link because that's what everyone does, as if it's Gospel.

@RogueLodyte My link wasn't from the government. It was a summation of various statistics.

@JimboSaturn Statistics from WHERE?

@RogueLodyte https://factually.co/fact-checks/justice/percentage-ice-arrests-criminal-vs-civil-2f3f82 US sources.

@JimboSaturn And of course, we all know that everything posted on every internet website is "fact". If it's on the internet or mainstream media, it must be true 👍🏼. "I saw it on TV". See, THAT's what's funny.

@RogueLodyte No. You should always double check things. That's why I like these kinds of sites, it gets data from everywhere.

Also, if you can't get fact from the internet, or media, and fact check, where would you get facts? I'm sure you probably get your facts from the internet too, but just sites that you favour.

@JimboSaturn I get "facts" via the best source of all...personal experience.

@RogueLodyte That sounds problematic. How would personal experience help you know the amount of PHD graduates in Zimbabwe?

How would your personal experience help you with the number of gang members arrested by ICE? Do you work in their detention center?

@JimboSaturn Yep..."problematic". Hold on to your hat, but I am capable of thinking for myself and making my own decisions about things that matter. Who cares about the amount of PHD graduates in Zimbabwe, unless one is pretending to be an internet know-it-all with Google copy & paste.

@RogueLodyte You're missing the point. Caring is not the factor, it's the idea that personal experience wouldn't help you with most facts.

@JimboSaturn It helps with facts I give a damn about. Like I said, ,,,

@JimboSaturn And by the way, I'm not "missing" 🙄 any point. I'm just not buying it.

@RogueLodyte You don't agree can cant personally experience facts? So your knowledge is only based on your personal experiences? Thats nonsense. Think that over

@JimboSaturn Speaking of nonsense...
HUH??
"Only". YOUR word, not mine. I think you are upset because I can think on my own, and don't need some talking head to tell me what to do. THAT's what is "problematic" to liberals.